Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104954
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Native speakers’ judgment of the epistemic evidentiality of synonym verbs of “think” in Mandarin : a corpus-based study of Renwei, Yiwei, Juede, Kaolü, and Xiang
Authors: Ye, Y 
Hsu, YY 
Issue Date: 2024
Source: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 2024, v. 14515, p. 301-315
Abstract: The synonym of epistemic “think” in Chinese is understudied. This study surveys the usage of five synonyms of verbs related to “think” – renwei, juede, yiwei, xiang, and kaolü – by using the Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. By studying the contexts of the target verbs, we report the distributions of three types of nouns and two types of adverbs in relation to the target verbs among three genres, and then we discuss their potential effects on epistemic evidentiality. Next, we conduct a survey study to examine native speakers’ judgments of the epistemic evidentiality of sentences that contain the five target verbs with the types of nouns and adverbs extracted from the Sinia corpus. The results show that “renwei” has the highest ratings of evidentiality, followed by “juede,” while “yiwei” and “xiang” have the lowest mean ratings. “Kaolü” is often regarded as irrelevant or neutral concerning epistemic evidentiality.
Keywords: Cognitive verbs
Evidentiality
Near-synonyms
Publisher: Springer
Journal: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) 
ISSN: 0302-9743
EISSN: 1611-3349
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-0586-3_24
Rights: © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024
This version of the proceeding paper has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use(https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0586-3_24.
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ye_Native_Speakers_Judgment.pdfPre-Published version1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

79
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

5
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.