Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104947
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Wen_US
dc.creatorTao, Qen_US
dc.creatorFeng, Qen_US
dc.creatorSun, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T01:23:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-13T01:23:14Z-
dc.identifier.citationv. 133, 106662-
dc.identifier.issn0264-9993en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104947-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.subjectFirm risk-takingen_US
dc.subjectSupplier concentrationen_US
dc.subjectTransaction cost perspectiveen_US
dc.titleSupplier concentration and firm risk-taking : transaction cost perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume133en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106662en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examines whether and how supplier concentration affects firm risk-taking. While the literature mostly focuses on customer concentration and firm risk-taking, it overlooks the role of suppliers. Based on a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2007 to 2020, we fill this gap by demonstrating that supplier concentration significantly increases firm risk-taking. Our findings remain robust to alternative measurement and endogeneity tests. Regarding the underlying channel, high inventory management efficiency (i.e., low transaction costs) amplifies the positive effect of supplier concentration on firm risk-taking. Additionally, this positive effect is more pronounced in industries more inclined to efficient business operations, specifically those with higher participation in Global Value Chains and with lower market monopoly power. Collectively, our results suggest that the hypothesis from the transaction cost perspective well explains the positive effect of supplier concentration on firm risk-taking.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEconomic modelling, Apr. 2024, v. 133, 106662en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEconomic modellingen_US
dcterms.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6122en_US
dc.identifier.artn106662en_US
dc.description.validate202403 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2640-
dc.identifier.SubFormID47990-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-04-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
dc.relation.rdatahttps://data.mendeley.com/preview/w3bytc5xtw?a=3bca3808-e32a-4a28-8b3c-00dfea533888en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-04-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

33
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.