Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104885
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Managementen_US
dc.creatorRyu, Ken_US
dc.creatorLee, JSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-05T01:27:23Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-05T01:27:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn1096-3480en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104885-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication "Ryu, K., & Lee, J.-S. (2017). Examination of Restaurant Quality, Relationship Benefits, and Customer Reciprocity From the Perspective of Relationship Marketing Investments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 41(1), 66-92. Copyright © 2013 ( International Council on Hotel, Restaurant and Institutional Education). DOI: 10.1177/1096348013515919.”en_US
dc.subjectCustomer reciprocityen_US
dc.subjectRelationship benefiten_US
dc.subjectRelationship marketing investmenten_US
dc.subjectRestaurant qualityen_US
dc.titleExamination of restaurant quality, relationship benefits, and customer reciprocity from the perspective of relationship marketing investmentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage66en_US
dc.identifier.epage92en_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1096348013515919en_US
dcterms.abstractThe current study adopted cluster and discriminant analyses to investigate how differentially upscale restaurant customers view (a) the four dimensions of restaurant quality (price fairness, food quality, service quality, and physical environment), (b) the three dimensions of relational benefits (confidence benefits, social benefits, and special treatment benefits), and (c) revisit intentions and favorable reciprocal behaviors as proxies for customer reciprocity when customers perceive different levels (high vs. low) of relationship marketing investment (RMI). When customers perceived high RMI, they (high-RMI customers) evaluated all the aforementioned factors positively. By contrast, customers who experienced low RMI (low-RMI customers) rated the same factors negatively. High- and low-RMI customers were best distinguished by service quality, confidence benefits, and favorable reciprocal behaviors. Understanding the distinction between high- and low-RMI customers will shed light on how operators of upscale restaurants develop and reinforce perceived RMI to achieve favorable customer reciprocity.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of hospitality and tourism research, Jan. 2017, v. 41, no. 1, p. 66-92en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of hospitality and tourism researchen_US
dcterms.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85006421894-
dc.identifier.eissn1557-7554en_US
dc.description.validate202401 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSHTM-0825-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6705607-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lee_Examination_Restaurant_Quality.pdfPre-Published version486.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

15
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

Downloads

5
Citations as of Jul 7, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

61
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

52
Citations as of Jul 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.