Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104856
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Management-
dc.creatorTung, VWS-
dc.creatorLaw, R-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-05T01:27:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-05T01:27:01Z-
dc.identifier.issn0250-8281-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104856-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Tourism Recreation Research on 01 Jun 2017 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02508281.2017.1331877.en_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectFundingen_US
dc.subjectResearch grantsen_US
dc.subjectResearch performanceen_US
dc.subjectReviewersen_US
dc.titleEvaluating external research grant proposals in tourism and hospitality : insights from senior researchersen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage457-
dc.identifier.epage466-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02508281.2017.1331877-
dcterms.abstractAn academic’s ability to secure external research grants is an important indicator of research performance. However, the method by which to write a successful grant is neither uniform nor standardised, and insights for tourism researchers to write a successful grant application is lacking. The objective of this study is to examine how experienced scholars review research grant applications in order to facilitate a better understanding of grant writing for tourism academics. Four critical factors were identified via in-depth interviews with senior tourism and hospitality researchers who have extensive grant review experience. These factors include: the impact of the research, execution of the study, track record of the research team, and budget of the project. Overall, this study contributes by helping new and emerging scholars gain confidence in preparing better applications, and by allowing mid-career and senior researchers to (re)assess their own grant writing styles.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTourism recreation research, 2017, v. 42, no. 4, p. 457-466-
dcterms.isPartOfTourism recreation research-
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85020177812-
dc.identifier.eissn2320-0308-
dc.description.validate202401 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSHTM-0721en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6750699en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tung_Evaluating_External_Research.pdfPre-Published version805.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

86
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

52
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.