Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104838
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Hotel and Tourism Management | - |
| dc.creator | Leung, R | - |
| dc.creator | Au, N | - |
| dc.creator | Liu, J | - |
| dc.creator | Law, R | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-05T01:26:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-05T01:26:51Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1356-7667 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104838 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is the accepted version of the publication "Leung, R., Au, N., Liu, J., & Law, R. (2018). Do customers share the same perspective? A study on online OTAs ratings versus user ratings of Hong Kong hotels. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 24(2), 103-117. Copyright © 2016 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/1356766716679483.” | en_US |
| dc.subject | Expectation disconfirmation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hong Kong hotels | en_US |
| dc.subject | OTA star rating | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rating discrepancy | en_US |
| dc.subject | User rating | en_US |
| dc.title | Do customers share the same perspective? A study on online OTAs ratings versus user ratings of Hong Kong hotels | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 103 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 117 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 24 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1356766716679483 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Hotel service levels and pricing range are often denoted by the “star” rating system predominant in that country. This rating system depends considerably on travel agencies to disseminate information to consumers to assist them in their hotel selection. Given the popularity of online travel agencies (OTAs) and review websites, consumers can now compare published star and user ratings of hotels online to obtain a complete idea of the hotel service standards from the perspective of other users. This study attempted to analyze the difference among the star and user ratings published in eight popular OTAs. Findings showed that Priceline and Ctrip had the lowest website star ratings, whereas Bookings.com and Agoda had the highest for both local chain and independent hotels. A comparison of the star and user ratings indicated that Priceline, TripAdvisor, and Hotels.com had no statistical difference, but the other five OTAs exhibited statistical differences. The findings also indicated that Ctrip had higher user rating scores among the OTAs, possibly indicating that Chinese users rate hotels higher than other nationalities do. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of vacation marketing, Apr. 2018, v. 24, no. 2, p. 103-117 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of vacation marketing | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2018-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85045383883 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1479-1870 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202401 bckw | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | SHTM-0653 | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6834058 | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au_Do_Customers_Share.pdf | Pre-Published version | 784.29 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
112
Last Week
6
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
84
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
16
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



