Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104807
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Management-
dc.creatorZhang, CXen_US
dc.creatorXiao, Hen_US
dc.creatorMorgan, Nen_US
dc.creatorLy, TPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-05T01:26:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-05T01:26:37Z-
dc.identifier.issn0160-7383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104807-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhang, C. X., Xiao, H., Morgan, N., & Ly, T. P. (2018). Politics of memories: Identity construction in museums. Annals of Tourism Research, 73, 116-130 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.09.011.en_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectHeritage tourismen_US
dc.subjectNational identityen_US
dc.subjectPostcolonial representationen_US
dc.subjectTransnational collective memoryen_US
dc.titlePolitics of memories : identity construction in museumsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage116en_US
dc.identifier.epage130en_US
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annals.2018.09.011en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper adopts collective memory theory to reveal processes through which heritage tourism stakeholders (re)construct contested national identity. Theoretically sensitised to identity crisis, the study analyses how Hong Kong and Macao heritage managers utilise complex transnational memories to (re)construct an identity aligned with, yet distinct from, that of China. Through a critical discourse analysis of interviews and discursive exhibition and museum texts, the article reveals that museum managers formulate heritage imaginings and a sense of belonging(s) through defining the collective memory for “Self” and “Other”. The article concludes that, by collective memory-building, museum professionals make tangible statements of national identities through legitimating negotiations and resistance in heritage tourism discourse. Implications for heritage tourism studies and museum management are also discussed.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnnals of tourism research, Nov. 2018, v. 73, p. 116-130en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAnnals of tourism researchen_US
dcterms.issued2018-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054087585-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7722en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSHTM-0566-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS23763368-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Xiao_Politics_Memories_Identity.pdfPre-Published version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

105
Last Week
11
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

381
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

65
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

58
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.