Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104578
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorJi, Pen_US
dc.creatorJin, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:51:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:51:16Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4673-7682-2 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4673-7681-5 (CD)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104578-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication P. Ji and J. Jin, "Extraction of comparative opinionate sentences from product online reviews," 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China, 2015, pp. 1777-1785 is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2015.7382216.en_US
dc.subjectCompetitor analysisen_US
dc.subjectCustomer requirementen_US
dc.subjectProduct comparisonen_US
dc.subjectProduct designen_US
dc.subjectReview analysisen_US
dc.subjectText miningen_US
dc.titleExtraction of comparative opinionate sentences from product online reviewsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage1777en_US
dc.identifier.epage1785en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/FSKD.2015.7382216en_US
dcterms.abstractBig volume of product online reviews are generated from time to time, which contain rich information regarding customer requirements. These reviews help designers to make exhaustive analyses of competitors, which is one indispensable step in market-driven product design. How to extract critical opinionate sentences associated with some specific features from product online reviews has been investigated by some researchers. However, few of them examined how to select a small number of representative yet comparative sentences for competitor analysis. In this research, a framework is illustrated to select pairs of opinionate sentences referring to a specific feature from reviews of competitive products. With the help of the techniques on sentiment analysis, opinionate sentences referring to a specific feature are first identified from product online reviews. Then, for the selection of a small number of representative yet comparative opinionate sentences, information representativeness, information comparativeness and information diversity are investigated. Accordingly, an optimization problem is formulated, and three greedy algorithms are proposed to analyze this problem for suboptimal solutions. Finally, with a large amount of real data from Amazon.com, categories of extensive experiments are conducted and the final encouraging results are realized, which prove the effectiveness of the proposed approach.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitation2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China, 15-17 August, 2015, p. 1777-1785en_US
dcterms.issued2015-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84966526022-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery [FSKD]en_US
dc.description.validate202402 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0992-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe National Natural Science Foundation of China; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Univerisities, China; The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS9572459-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ji_Extraction_Comparative_Opinionate.pdfPre-Published version1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

99
Last Week
7
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

74
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.