Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104480
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.creatorDong, Len_US
dc.creatorSun, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:50:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:50:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0144-1647en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104480-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Transport Reviews on 15 Mar 2018 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01441647.2018.1451407.en_US
dc.subjectCompetitivenessen_US
dc.subjectInterval AHPen_US
dc.subjectMulti-attribute decision analysisen_US
dc.subjectPorten_US
dc.subjectProjection methoden_US
dc.titleCompetitiveness prioritisation of container ports in Asia under the background of China’s Belt and Road initiativeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author's file: Competitiveness Prioritization of Container Ports in Asia under the Background of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis Method and Case Studyen_US
dc.identifier.spage436en_US
dc.identifier.epage456en_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01441647.2018.1451407en_US
dcterms.abstractThe understanding of the competitiveness of different ports under the background of China’s “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) is critical for drafting appropriate plans and taking suitable actions to select the best port in the logistics supply chains. A novel Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis (MADA) was proposed for the evaluation of port competitiveness. In the developed MADA method, the interval Analytic Hierarchy Process and the projection method was combined for the evaluation of port competitiveness. Three container ports in Asia including Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Singapore were studied under the background of China’s BRI. The results demonstrate that the port of Singapore is the most competitive at the initial stage of China’s BRI, followed by Hong Kong and Shanghai in the descending order. The results were validated by sum weighted method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution method, and sensitivity analysis was also carried out. The competitiveness of the three ports in the next ten years were also studied with the consideration of the influences of China’s BRI, and the results reveal that Shanghai port can even exceed Hong Kong port and Singapore port if it can effectively take the advantage s of China’s BRI.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransport reviews, 2018, v. 38, no. 4, p. 436-456en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransport reviewsen_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85046483345-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5327en_US
dc.description.validate202402 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0625-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Start-up Grant of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for New Employeesen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6838072-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ren_Competitiveness_Prioritisation_Container.pdfPre-Published version1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

100
Last Week
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

86
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.