Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104469
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering | - |
| dc.creator | Liu, HC | en_US |
| dc.creator | You, XY | en_US |
| dc.creator | Tsung, F | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ji, P | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-05T08:50:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-05T08:50:10Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0898-2112 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104469 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2018 Taylor & Francis | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Quality Engineering on 11 Jun 2018 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08982112.2018.1448089. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cluster analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Healthcare risk assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Prospect theory | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reliability management | en_US |
| dc.title | An improved approach for failure mode and effect analysis involving large group of experts : an application to the healthcare field | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 762 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 775 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/08982112.2018.1448089 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a team-based technique for prospectively identifying and prioritizing failure modes of products, processes, and services. Given its simplicity and visibility, FMEA has been widely used in different industries for quality and reliability planning. However, various shortcomings are inherent to the traditional FMEA method, particularly in assessing failure modes, weighting risk factors, and ranking failure modes, which greatly reduce the accuracy of FMEA. Additionally, the classical FMEA focuses on the risk analysis problems in which a small number of experts participate. Nowadays, with the increasing complexity of products and processes, an FMEA may require the participation of larger number of experts from distributed departments or organizations. Therefore, in this article, we present a novel risk priority approach using cluster analysis and prospect theory for FMEA when involving a large group of experts. Furthermore, an entropy-based method is proposed to derive the weights of risk factors objectively by utilizing the risk-evaluation information. Finally, we take an empirical healthcare risk analysis case to illustrate the proposed large group FMEA (LGFMEA) approach, and conduct a comparative study to evaluate its validity and practicability. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Quality engineering, 2018, v. 30, no. 4, p. 762-775 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Quality engineering | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85048376602 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1532-4222 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202402 bcch | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | ISE-0580 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | The National Natural Science Foundation of China; The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; Shanghai Youth Top-Nptch Talent Development Pogram, China | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 20786661 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ji_Improved_Approach_Failure.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
107
Last Week
12
12
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
98
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
93
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
83
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



