Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104469
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorLiu, HCen_US
dc.creatorYou, XYen_US
dc.creatorTsung, Fen_US
dc.creatorJi, Pen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:50:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:50:10Z-
dc.identifier.issn0898-2112en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104469-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc.en_US
dc.rights© 2018 Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Quality Engineering on 11 Jun 2018 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08982112.2018.1448089.en_US
dc.subjectCluster analysisen_US
dc.subjectFailure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)en_US
dc.subjectHealthcare risk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectProspect theoryen_US
dc.subjectReliability managementen_US
dc.titleAn improved approach for failure mode and effect analysis involving large group of experts : an application to the healthcare fielden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage762en_US
dc.identifier.epage775en_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08982112.2018.1448089en_US
dcterms.abstractFailure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a team-based technique for prospectively identifying and prioritizing failure modes of products, processes, and services. Given its simplicity and visibility, FMEA has been widely used in different industries for quality and reliability planning. However, various shortcomings are inherent to the traditional FMEA method, particularly in assessing failure modes, weighting risk factors, and ranking failure modes, which greatly reduce the accuracy of FMEA. Additionally, the classical FMEA focuses on the risk analysis problems in which a small number of experts participate. Nowadays, with the increasing complexity of products and processes, an FMEA may require the participation of larger number of experts from distributed departments or organizations. Therefore, in this article, we present a novel risk priority approach using cluster analysis and prospect theory for FMEA when involving a large group of experts. Furthermore, an entropy-based method is proposed to derive the weights of risk factors objectively by utilizing the risk-evaluation information. Finally, we take an empirical healthcare risk analysis case to illustrate the proposed large group FMEA (LGFMEA) approach, and conduct a comparative study to evaluate its validity and practicability.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationQuality engineering, 2018, v. 30, no. 4, p. 762-775en_US
dcterms.isPartOfQuality engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048376602-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-4222en_US
dc.description.validate202402 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0580-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe National Natural Science Foundation of China; The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; Shanghai Youth Top-Nptch Talent Development Pogram, Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS20786661-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ji_Improved_Approach_Failure.pdfPre-Published version1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

107
Last Week
12
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

98
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

93
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

83
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.