Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104321
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ren, J | en_US |
| dc.creator | Liang, H | en_US |
| dc.creator | Chan, FTS | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-05T08:48:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-05T08:48:08Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0040-1625 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104321 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Ren, J., Liang, H., & Chan, F. T. S. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 29–39 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.070. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Best-worst method | en_US |
| dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision making | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sum weighted method | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sustainability assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | TOPSIS | en_US |
| dc.subject | Urban sewage sludge | en_US |
| dc.title | Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City : multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 29 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 39 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 116 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.070 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The treatment of urban sewage sludge is of vital importance for mitigating the risks of environmental contaminations, and the negative effects on human health. However, there are usually various different technologies for the treatment of urban sewage sludge; thus, it is difficult for decision-makers/stakeholders to select the most sustainable technology among multiple alternatives. This study aims at developing a generic multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainability assessment of the technologies for the treatment of urban sewage sludge. A generic criteria system including both hard and soft criteria in economic, environmental, social and technological aspects was developed for sustainability assessment. The improved analytic hierarchy process method, namely Best-Worst method, was employed to determine the weights of the criteria and the relative priorities of the technologies with respect to the soft criteria. Three MCDM methods including the sum weighted method, digraph model, and TOPSIS were used to determine sustainability sequence of the alternative technologies for the treatment of urban sewage sludge. Three technologies including landfilling, composting, and drying incineration have been studied using the proposed framework. The sustainability sequence of these three technologies determined by these three methods was obtained, and finally the priority sequence was determined as landing filling, drying incineration and composting in the descending order. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Technological forecasting and social change, Mar. 2017, v. 116, p. 29-39 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Technological forecasting and social change | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2017-03 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85028238549 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-5509 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202402 bcch | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | ISE-0827 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6775199 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ren_Urban_Sewage_Sludge.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
98
Last Week
4
4
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
102
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
204
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
176
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



