Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104321
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.creatorLiang, Hen_US
dc.creatorChan, FTSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:48:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:48:08Z-
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104321-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ren, J., Liang, H., & Chan, F. T. S. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 29–39 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.070.en_US
dc.subjectBest-worst methoden_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision makingen_US
dc.subjectSum weighted methoden_US
dc.subjectSustainability assessmenten_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectUrban sewage sludgeen_US
dc.titleUrban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City : multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst methoden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage29en_US
dc.identifier.epage39en_US
dc.identifier.volume116en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.070en_US
dcterms.abstractThe treatment of urban sewage sludge is of vital importance for mitigating the risks of environmental contaminations, and the negative effects on human health. However, there are usually various different technologies for the treatment of urban sewage sludge; thus, it is difficult for decision-makers/stakeholders to select the most sustainable technology among multiple alternatives. This study aims at developing a generic multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainability assessment of the technologies for the treatment of urban sewage sludge. A generic criteria system including both hard and soft criteria in economic, environmental, social and technological aspects was developed for sustainability assessment. The improved analytic hierarchy process method, namely Best-Worst method, was employed to determine the weights of the criteria and the relative priorities of the technologies with respect to the soft criteria. Three MCDM methods including the sum weighted method, digraph model, and TOPSIS were used to determine sustainability sequence of the alternative technologies for the treatment of urban sewage sludge. Three technologies including landfilling, composting, and drying incineration have been studied using the proposed framework. The sustainability sequence of these three technologies determined by these three methods was obtained, and finally the priority sequence was determined as landing filling, drying incineration and composting in the descending order.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTechnological forecasting and social change, Mar. 2017, v. 116, p. 29-39en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTechnological forecasting and social changeen_US
dcterms.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85028238549-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5509en_US
dc.description.validate202402 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0827-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6775199-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ren_Urban_Sewage_Sludge.pdfPre-Published version1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

98
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

102
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

204
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

176
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.