Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104312
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ren, J | en_US |
| dc.creator | Liang, H | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-05T08:48:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-05T08:48:04Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1361-9209 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104312 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Ren, J., & Liang, H. (2017). Measuring the sustainability of marine fuels: A fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 54, 12–29 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.004. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fuzzy set | en_US |
| dc.subject | Group decision making | en_US |
| dc.subject | Marine fuel | en_US |
| dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision making | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sustainability assessment | en_US |
| dc.title | Measuring the sustainability of marine fuels : a fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making approach | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 12 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 29 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 54 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.004 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The use of alternative energy sources instead of HFO has been recognized as a promising way for reducing emissions from shipping and promoting the development of green shipping. However, it is usually difficult for the decision-making to select the best choice among multiple alternative marine fuels. In order to address this, a complete criteria system for sustainability assessment of alternative marine fuels was firstly established, and a fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making method has been developed to rank the alternative marine fuels by combining fuzzy logarithmic least squares and fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution). Fuzzy logarithmic least squares method has been employed to determine the weights of the criteria for sustainability assessment, and fuzzy TOPSIS was employed to determine the sustainability order of the alternatives. An illustrative case with three alternative marine fuels including methanol, LNG and hydrogen has been studied by the proposed method, and hydrogen has been recognized as the most sustainable scenario, follows by LNG, and methanol in the descending order. The results show that the proposed method is feasible for prioritizing the alternative marine fuels; it also has the ability to help the decision-makers to select the most sustainable option among multiple marine fuels. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, July 2017, v. 54, p. 12-29 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2017-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85019073603 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-2340 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202402 bcch | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | ISE-0796 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6745510 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ren_Measuring_Sustainability_Marine.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
113
Last Week
5
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
114
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
97
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
87
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



