Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104291
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering | - |
| dc.creator | Ren, J | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ren, X | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-05T08:47:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-05T08:47:53Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104291 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Ren, J., & Ren, X. (2018). Sustainability ranking of energy storage technologies under uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1387–1398 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.229. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Energy storage technology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fuzzy set: interval numbers | en_US |
| dc.subject | Multi-attribute decision analysis | en_US |
| dc.title | Sustainability ranking of energy storage technologies under uncertainties | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1387 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1398 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 170 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.229 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The selection of the most suitable or the best energy storage technology among multiple alternatives is of vital importance for promoting the development of renewable energy. This study aims at developing a multi-attribute decision analysis framework for sustainability prioritization of energy storage technologies. A criteria system which consists of ten criteria in four categories (economic, performance, technological and environmental) was developed for sustainability assessment of energy storage technologies. The Non-Linear Fuzzy Prioritization which allows the users to use fuzzy numbers to establish the comparison judgments was employed to determine the weights of the evaluation criteria, and a novel interval multi-attribute decision analysis method which can rank the alternative energy storage technologies based on the interval decision-making matrix was developed for sustainability prioritization of energy storage technologies. An illustrative case including five energy storage technologies including pumped hydro (PH), compressed air (CA), Lead-Acid (LA), Lithium-ion (LI), and Flywheel (FW) was studied by the proposed method, and PH was recognized as the most sustainable technology. The results were validated by the interval TOPSIS method, and sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate the effects of the weights of the evaluation criteria on the sustainability order of the five energy storage technologies. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of cleaner production, 1 Jan. 2018, v. 170, p. 1387-1398 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of cleaner production | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2018-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85031941670 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202402 bcch | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | ISE-0734 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6790617 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ren_Sustainability_Ranking_Energy.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
101
Last Week
6
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
80
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
101
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
88
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



