Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104291
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.creatorRen, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:47:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:47:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104291-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ren, J., & Ren, X. (2018). Sustainability ranking of energy storage technologies under uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1387–1398 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.229.en_US
dc.subjectEnergy storage technologyen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy set: interval numbersen_US
dc.subjectMulti-attribute decision analysisen_US
dc.titleSustainability ranking of energy storage technologies under uncertaintiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1387en_US
dc.identifier.epage1398en_US
dc.identifier.volume170en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.229en_US
dcterms.abstractThe selection of the most suitable or the best energy storage technology among multiple alternatives is of vital importance for promoting the development of renewable energy. This study aims at developing a multi-attribute decision analysis framework for sustainability prioritization of energy storage technologies. A criteria system which consists of ten criteria in four categories (economic, performance, technological and environmental) was developed for sustainability assessment of energy storage technologies. The Non-Linear Fuzzy Prioritization which allows the users to use fuzzy numbers to establish the comparison judgments was employed to determine the weights of the evaluation criteria, and a novel interval multi-attribute decision analysis method which can rank the alternative energy storage technologies based on the interval decision-making matrix was developed for sustainability prioritization of energy storage technologies. An illustrative case including five energy storage technologies including pumped hydro (PH), compressed air (CA), Lead-Acid (LA), Lithium-ion (LI), and Flywheel (FW) was studied by the proposed method, and PH was recognized as the most sustainable technology. The results were validated by the interval TOPSIS method, and sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate the effects of the weights of the evaluation criteria on the sustainability order of the five energy storage technologies.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of cleaner production, 1 Jan. 2018, v. 170, p. 1387-1398en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of cleaner productionen_US
dcterms.issued2018-01-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85031941670-
dc.description.validate202402 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0734-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6790617-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ren_Sustainability_Ranking_Energy.pdfPre-Published version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

101
Last Week
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

80
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

101
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

88
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.