Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104257
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorXu, Den_US
dc.creatorLv, Len_US
dc.creatorRen, Xen_US
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.creatorDong, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:47:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:47:36Z-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104257-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Xu, D., Lv, L., Ren, X., Ren, J., & Dong, L. (2018). Route selection for low-carbon ammonia production: A sustainability prioritization framework based-on the combined weights and projection ranking by similarity to referencing vector method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 263–276 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.054.en_US
dc.subjectCombined weightsen_US
dc.subjectCriteria systemen_US
dc.subjectLow-carbon ammonia productionen_US
dc.subjectPRSRV methoden_US
dc.subjectSustainability prioritizationen_US
dc.titleRoute selection for low-carbon ammonia production : a sustainability prioritization framework based-on the combined weights and projection ranking by similarity to referencing vector methoden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage263en_US
dc.identifier.epage276en_US
dc.identifier.volume193en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.054en_US
dcterms.abstractIn this study, a mathematical framework was developed for the sustainability prioritization of alternative low-carbon ammonia production routes. In the framework, a four-dimensional assessment system that can incorporate both quantitative and qualitative criteria from the environmental, economic, social-political, and technical concerns was firstly established. Subsequently, a hybrid Entropy-FANP method was employed to determine the criteria's weight by combining the objective data and subjective opinions; a novel PRSRV approach was developed to rigorously rank the alternative routes by aggregating the absolute sustainability performance and relative sustainability balance of each alternative. The proposed framework was applied to prioritize five promising low-carbon routes for ammonia production, i.e. wind turbine electrolysis (WGEA), solar photovoltaic electrolysis (PVEA), hydropower electrolysis (HPEA), biomass gasification electrolysis (BGEA), and nuclear high temperature electrolysis (NTEA), yielding the sustainability ranking of HPEA > BGEA > WGEA > PVEA > NTEA. The robustness and effectiveness of the proposed framework were verified by conducting the sensitivity analysis and comparing the results determined by the proposed framework with those determined using the previous approaches.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of cleaner production, 20 Aug. 2018, v. 193, p. 263-276en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of cleaner productionen_US
dcterms.issued2018-08-20-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048159651-
dc.description.validate202402 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0606-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe National Science Foundation of China; the National Key R&D Program of China; the China Scholarship Council; and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitiesen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6844852-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ren_Route_Selection_Low-Carbon.pdfPre-Published version1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

121
Last Week
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

46
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

41
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

37
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.