Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104251
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:47:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:47:34Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104251-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ren, J. (2018c). Multi-criteria decision making for the prioritization of energy systems under uncertainties after life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 45–57 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.005.en_US
dc.subjectEnergy systemen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle sustainability assessmenten_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision makingen_US
dc.subjectSustainability assessmenten_US
dc.subjectUncertaintiesen_US
dc.titleMulti-criteria decision making for the prioritization of energy systems under uncertainties after life cycle sustainability assessmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage45en_US
dc.identifier.epage57en_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.005en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study aims at developing a life cycle sustainability prioritization framework for ranking the energy systems under uncertainties. The fuzzy two-stage logarithmic goal programming method was firstly employed to determine the weights of the criteria for sustainability assessment, and the interval grey relational analysis method was subsequently used to determine the sustainability order of the alternative energy systems. Then, an illustrative case including four alternatives for electricity generation in UK, namely, coal-pulverized, combined cycle gas turbines, nuclear-pressurized water reactor, and offshore wind powder based electricity, was investigated, and pressurized water reactor was recognized as the most sustainable, followed by combined cycle gas turbines, offshore wind powder, and coal-pulverized in the descending order. Finally, the results were validated by the interval TOPSIS, and sensitivity analysis was also carried used to investigate the effects of the weights of the criteria for sustainability assessment on the final sustainability order of the alternative energy systems.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable production and consumption, Oct. 2018, v. 16, p. 45-57en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable production and consumptionen_US
dcterms.issued2018-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85049357819-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-5509en_US
dc.description.validate202402 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0588-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS14457604-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ren_Multi-Criteria_Decision_Making.pdfPre-Published version1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

130
Last Week
8
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

85
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

52
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.