Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104177
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorMan, Yen_US
dc.creatorHan, Yen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Yen_US
dc.creatorLin, Ren_US
dc.creatorRen, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:46:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:46:56Z-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104177-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Man, Y., Han, Y., Liu, Y., Lin, R., & Ren, J. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of boxboard production: A life cycle perspective considering water consumption, energy consumption, GHG emissions, and internal costs. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109860 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109860.en_US
dc.subjectBoxboarden_US
dc.subjectLife cycle analysisen_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision makingen_US
dc.subjectPapermaking industryen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleMulti-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of boxboard production : a life cycle perspective considering water consumption, energy consumption, GHG emissions, and internal costsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume255en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109860en_US
dcterms.abstractPapermaking is a capital-intensive industry that requires a high consumption of plant fibers, energy, and water. Previous sustainability assessments of papermaking industry primarily focused on separate evaluations for multiple criteria without the integration for criteria and could not compare the overall priority of the production alternatives. The life cycle sustainability for the most representative boxboard production is analyzed as a case study in this work. Life cycle water consumption, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and internal costs are selected as the assessment criteria. The two multi-criteria decision-making methods are applied to integrate the above criteria to obtain the sustainability sequence under different production pathways. When the papermaking enterprises are regarded as decision-makers, the alternative using waste paper as raw material to manufacture boxboard is the most sustainable, following by mixed fiber. The sustainability sequence of the alternatives using wood and straw as raw materials is controversial due to the different calculation models. Changing the proportion of raw materials and the criteria weights might adjust sustainability sequence of the alternatives.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of environmental management, 1 Feb. 2020, v. 255, 109860en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of environmental managementen_US
dcterms.issued2020-02-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075143327-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8630en_US
dc.identifier.artn109860en_US
dc.description.validate202402 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberISE-0348-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextDepartmental General Research Funds, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineeringen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS20786923-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liu_Multi-Criteria_Decision_Making.pdfPre-Published version1.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

85
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

80
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.