Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104069
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorWang, Ken_US
dc.creatorHuo, Ben_US
dc.creatorTian, Men_US
dc.creatorYeung, ACLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T06:16:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-24T06:16:01Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/104069-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectTrusten_US
dc.subjectContractsen_US
dc.subjectTechnological turbulenceen_US
dc.subjectDependence disadvantageen_US
dc.subjectOpportunismen_US
dc.titleRevisiting the interplay of trust and contracts : the roles of technological turbulence and dependence disadvantageen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100895en_US
dcterms.abstractDrawing on information processing theory, this study revisits the interplay between trust and contracts by comprehensively examining the impact of the interaction of different types of trust (i.e., ability trust and goodwill trust) and contracts (i.e., control contract and coordination contract) under different uncertainties (i.e., technology turbulence and dependence disadvantage) on supplier opportunism. We build a moderated moderation model to test the proposed hypotheses using a combined dataset of a survey of 200 Chinese manufacturers and secondary data. The results show that coordination contract weakens the effectiveness of ability trust but strengthens the effectiveness of goodwill trust. When firms face a high level of technological turbulence, both types of contracts weaken the effectiveness of ability trust in curbing opportunism, while under a high level of dependence disadvantage, contracts weaken ability trust but reinforce goodwill trust in curbing opportunism. Our results are found to be robust after being verified by a variety of statistical specifications and estimations. The results provide nuanced insights for both the literature and practice.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of purchasing and supply management, Jan. 2025, v. 31, no. 1, 100895en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of purchasing and supply managementen_US
dcterms.issued2025-01-
dc.identifier.eissn1478-4092en_US
dc.identifier.artn100895en_US
dc.description.validate202401 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2591-
dc.identifier.SubFormID47934-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-01-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-01-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

150
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 5, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Oct 9, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.