Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103724
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorHo, LPen_US
dc.creatorHo, SSMen_US
dc.creatorLeung, DYPen_US
dc.creatorSo, WKWen_US
dc.creatorChan, CWHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T03:10:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-02T03:10:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103724-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.rights© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Ho, L.P., Ho, S.S., Leung, D.Y., So, W.K. and Chan, C.W. (2016), A feasibility and efficacy randomised controlled trial of swaddling for controlling procedural pain in preterm infants. J Clin Nurs, 25(3-4): 472-482, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13075. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.en_US
dc.subjectHeelsticken_US
dc.subjectInterventionen_US
dc.subjectNeonatal careen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectPretermen_US
dc.subjectSwaddlingen_US
dc.titleA feasibility and efficacy randomised controlled trial of swaddling for controlling procedural pain in preterm infantsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage472en_US
dc.identifier.epage482en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue3-4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.13075en_US
dcterms.abstractAims and objectives: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of swaddling to control procedural pain among preterm infants.-
dcterms.abstractBackground: Swaddling has been recommended for controlling neonatal pain. However, the feasibility for use is uncertain and insufficient evidence is available among preterm infants.-
dcterms.abstractDesign: A two-arm randomised controlled trial with repeated measures.-
dcterms.abstractMethod: The study was conducted in a 21-bed neonatal intensive care unit of a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Preterm infants who required heelstick procedure were eligible. Fifty-four preterm infants between 30-37 gestational weeks were randomly assigned to swaddling (n = 27) and control (standard care, n = 27) groups. Pain assessment was performed pre, during, immediate, two, four, six and eight minutes after heelstick procedure using the Premature Infant Pain Profile.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The mean Premature Infant Pain Profile scores were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group during, immediate, two, four, and six minutes after the heelstick procedure. The mean changes of heart rate and oxygen saturation in the intervention group were significantly lower than that of the control group at all measured time points. Notably, the swaddled infants quickly resumed to the baseline level at two minutes whereas the control group reached the stable state at an extended period of six minutes.-
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The findings show that swaddling is feasible and efficacious in controlling pain for heelstick procedure among preterm infants. No adverse effects were observed.-
dcterms.abstractRelevance to clinical practice: This article presents the feasibility and efficacy of swaddling as a non-pharmacological and non-invasive intervention to relieve pain during the heelstick procedures among preterm infants. Swaddling can contribute to control minor procedural pain in neonates as one of the simple, safe, cost effective, humanistic and natural analgesia alternatives.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of clinical nursing, Feb. 2016, v. 25, no. 3-4, p. 472-482en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of clinical nursingen_US
dcterms.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84955575580-
dc.identifier.pmid26818372-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2702en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSN-0615-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6611592-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ho_Feasibility_Efficacy_Randomised.pdfPre-Published version475.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

91
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

93
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

38
Citations as of Aug 22, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.