Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103703
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Nursing | en_US |
| dc.contributor | Department of Biomedical Engineering | en_US |
| dc.creator | Wang, G | en_US |
| dc.creator | Deng, Z | en_US |
| dc.creator | Choi, KS | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-02T03:10:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-02T03:10:14Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0925-2312 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103703 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Wang, G., Deng, Z., & Choi, K. S. (2017). Detection of epilepsy with Electroencephalogram using rule-based classifiers. Neurocomputing, 228, 283-290 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.080. | en_US |
| dc.subject | EEG | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ensemble learning approach | en_US |
| dc.subject | Random forest | en_US |
| dc.subject | Seizure detection | en_US |
| dc.subject | SVM | en_US |
| dc.title | Detection of epilepsy with Electroencephalogram using rule-based classifiers | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 283 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 290 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 228 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.080 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, characterized by recurrent seizures. Electroencephalogram (EEG), a useful measure for analysing the brain's electrical activity, has been widely used for the detection of epileptic seizures. Most existing classification techniques are primarily aimed at increasing detection accuracy, while the interpretability of the methods have received relatively little attention. In this work, we concentrate on the epileptic classification of EEG signals with interpretability. We propose an epilepsy detection framework, followed by a comparative study under this framework to evaluate the accuracy and interpretability of four rule-based classifiers, namely, the decision tree algorithm C4.5, the random forest algorithm (RF), the support vector machine (SVM)-based decision tree algorithm (SVM+C4.5), and the SVM-based RF algorithm (SVM+RF), in two-group, three-group, and–the most challenging of all–five-group classifications of EEG signals. The experimental results showed that RF outperformed the other three rule-based classifiers, achieving average accuracies of 0.9896, 0.9600, and 0.8260 for the two-group, three-group, and five-group seizure classifications respectively, and exhibiting higher interpretability. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Neurocomputing, 8 Mar. 2017, v. 228, p. 283-290 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Neurocomputing | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2017-03-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85009446545 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-8286 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202311 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | SN-0500 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | Hong Kong Polytechnic University; YC Yu Scholarship for Centre for Smart Health | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6714824 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang_Detection_Epilepsy_Electroencephalogram.pdf | Pre-Published version | 990.62 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
129
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025
Downloads
76
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
48
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
44
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



