Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103494
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorZhang, Sen_US
dc.creatorChan, APCen_US
dc.creatorFeng, Yen_US
dc.creatorDuan, Hen_US
dc.creatorKe, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:34:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:34:21Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-7863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103494-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhang, S., Chan, A. P., Feng, Y., Duan, H., & Ke, Y. (2016). Critical review on PPP Research–A search from the Chinese and International Journals. International journal of project management, 34(4), 597-612 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008.en_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectChinese journalsen_US
dc.subjectInternational journalsen_US
dc.subjectPublic-private partnershipen_US
dc.subjectResearchen_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.titleCritical review on PPP research - a search from the Chinese and international journalsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage597en_US
dc.identifier.epage612en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008en_US
dcterms.abstractA significant number of literatures have concentrated on diverse issues related to Public–Private Partnership (PPP) both in China and abroad. However, there is no systematic analysis on the PPP research progress and status in Chinese journals, which is worth investigating because China is one of the largest PPP markets globally. In addition, there are many PPP publications in international journals based on the context of China. A comparative study is still missing between the PPP publications in Chinese journals and international journals. This paper hence aims to conduct a critical review of PPP publications from selected first tier Chinese journals and international journals. Based on a three-stage literature review research framework, 615 and 70 high quality research papers on PPP topics were selected from Chinese and international journals in the last decade between 2005 and 2014, respectively. Main research methods, research topics and research findings were then identified through content analysis and statistical analysis methods. It is found that in these two journals the frequently adopted research methods are case study, literature review, modeling, questionnaire survey and comparison; and the popular research topics include PPP models and their application, risk management, financing and economic issues, legal and procurement issues, government regulation and guarantee. Comparison analysis results show that in terms of order of popularity, there are more similarities in the research topics than research methods in Chinese and international journals. The outcomes of this paper contribute to the PPP body of knowledge through summarizing PPP research in Chinese journals and international journals in the context of China. In addition, the findings are valuable for Chinese researchers to embark future research on PPP. This paper also breaks the language barrier and enriches western researchers a better understanding of the research status of PPP in the context of China.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of project management, May 2016, v. 34, no. 4, p. 597-612en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of project managementen_US
dcterms.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84959361696-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4634en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-1101-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6621534-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chan_Critical_Review_Research.pdfPre-Published version1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

138
Last Week
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

97
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

209
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

188
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.