Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103494
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | - |
| dc.creator | Zhang, S | en_US |
| dc.creator | Chan, APC | en_US |
| dc.creator | Feng, Y | en_US |
| dc.creator | Duan, H | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ke, Y | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-11T00:34:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-11T00:34:21Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0263-7863 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103494 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Zhang, S., Chan, A. P., Feng, Y., Duan, H., & Ke, Y. (2016). Critical review on PPP Research–A search from the Chinese and International Journals. International journal of project management, 34(4), 597-612 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008. | en_US |
| dc.subject | China | en_US |
| dc.subject | Chinese journals | en_US |
| dc.subject | International journals | en_US |
| dc.subject | Public-private partnership | en_US |
| dc.subject | Research | en_US |
| dc.subject | Review | en_US |
| dc.title | Critical review on PPP research - a search from the Chinese and international journals | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 597 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 612 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 34 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | A significant number of literatures have concentrated on diverse issues related to Public–Private Partnership (PPP) both in China and abroad. However, there is no systematic analysis on the PPP research progress and status in Chinese journals, which is worth investigating because China is one of the largest PPP markets globally. In addition, there are many PPP publications in international journals based on the context of China. A comparative study is still missing between the PPP publications in Chinese journals and international journals. This paper hence aims to conduct a critical review of PPP publications from selected first tier Chinese journals and international journals. Based on a three-stage literature review research framework, 615 and 70 high quality research papers on PPP topics were selected from Chinese and international journals in the last decade between 2005 and 2014, respectively. Main research methods, research topics and research findings were then identified through content analysis and statistical analysis methods. It is found that in these two journals the frequently adopted research methods are case study, literature review, modeling, questionnaire survey and comparison; and the popular research topics include PPP models and their application, risk management, financing and economic issues, legal and procurement issues, government regulation and guarantee. Comparison analysis results show that in terms of order of popularity, there are more similarities in the research topics than research methods in Chinese and international journals. The outcomes of this paper contribute to the PPP body of knowledge through summarizing PPP research in Chinese journals and international journals in the context of China. In addition, the findings are valuable for Chinese researchers to embark future research on PPP. This paper also breaks the language barrier and enriches western researchers a better understanding of the research status of PPP in the context of China. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | International journal of project management, May 2016, v. 34, no. 4, p. 597-612 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | International journal of project management | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2016-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84959361696 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-4634 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202312 bcch | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | BRE-1101 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 6621534 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chan_Critical_Review_Research.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
138
Last Week
6
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
97
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
209
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
188
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



