Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103479
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorWu, Cen_US
dc.creatorXu, Ben_US
dc.creatorMao, Cen_US
dc.creatorLi, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:34:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:34:15Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103479-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Constructionen_US
dc.rights© 2017 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wu, C., Xu, B., Mao, C., & Li, X. (2017). Overview of BIM maturity measurement tools. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 22, 34-62 is available at http://www.itcon.org/2017/3.en_US
dc.subjectBIM Maturityen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement Toolsen_US
dc.subjectOverviewen_US
dc.titleOverview of BIM maturity measurement toolsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage34en_US
dc.identifier.epage62en_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dcterms.abstractBuilding Information Modelling has experienced rapid development in recent years. Recognized the numerous benefits, various organizations and stakeholders have begun to implement BIM. Contrary to the extensive application, successful implementation requires a thorough understanding of current situation of BIM operations as well as effective, advanced, and high-performing measurements. Despite the existing studies of BIM maturity measurement tools, there is no comprehensive review yet, resulting in confusions faced by BIM users that need to conduct such evaluations. This study exhaustively reviews nine mainstream BIM measurement tools developed in the past years, shedding light on their distinct features. According to the findings, no universal applicable tool exists and each tool has unique emphasis, strengths and weaknesses, matching different users. Besides, some patterns of measuring scope, measures selections and evaluation methods along the development of these tools are also identified. Therefore, this study could not only help BIM users to choose appropriate tools based on their unique demands, but also serve as reference for developments of new tools in the future.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of information technology in construction, 2017, v. 22, p. 34-62en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of information technology in constructionen_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.eissn1874-4753en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-1033-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS57677925-
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Li_Overview_Bim_Maturity.pdf1.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

197
Citations as of Jun 22, 2025

Downloads

159
Citations as of Jun 22, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.