Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103454
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorMok, KYen_US
dc.creatorShen, GQen_US
dc.creatorYang, RJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:34:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:34:04Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-7863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103454-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, R. J. (2017). Addressing stakeholder complexity and major pitfalls in large cultural building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 463-478 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.009.en_US
dc.subjectCultural building projecten_US
dc.subjectSocial network analysisen_US
dc.subjectStakeholderen_US
dc.titleAddressing stakeholder complexity and major pitfalls in large cultural building projectsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage463en_US
dc.identifier.epage478en_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.009en_US
dcterms.abstractMany countries have put substantial investment into constructing large and iconic cultural buildings because they are the emblems of civic pride, as well as tools to generalize cultural and economic benefits. However, stories of project failures are often heard in this rapid cultural building boom. In fact, many pitfalls in developing large cultural building projects (CBPs) are associated to the stakeholders since they are the actual central figures of a project. As such, addressing stakeholder complexity and understanding major pitfalls in CBPs from stakeholder perspective are crucial to the successful management of these projects, yet relevant empirical studies remain lacking. To fill this gap, case study of a large performing arts center was conducted. A holistic stakeholder analysis approach, which applies both rationalistic methods (e.g. social network analysis) and empirical methods (e.g. survey and interviews), was adopted to address stakeholder complexity in the case. Three major pitfalls in large CBPs were identified, including ‘developing accurate end users' requirements’, ‘balancing between aesthetics, functionality and resources’, and ‘leadership team makeup, vision, charisma and learning stance’. Their underlying causes and possible solutions were discussed. This study contributes theoretically by illustrating a holistic approach of analyzing and addressing stakeholder complexity, and provides practical value by understanding the pitfalls of CBPs from stakeholder perspective.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of project management, Apr. 2017, v. 35, no. 3, p. 463-478en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of project managementen_US
dcterms.issued2017-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009726459-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4634en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0961-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6715214-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mok_Addressing_Stakeholder_Complexity.pdfPre-Published version1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

112
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

193
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

52
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.