Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103449
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorShan, Men_US
dc.creatorChan, APCen_US
dc.creatorLe, Yen_US
dc.creatorHu, Yen_US
dc.creatorXia, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:33:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:33:58Z-
dc.identifier.issn1052-3928en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103449-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000314.en_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectCollusive practiceen_US
dc.subjectConstruction projectsen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding collusive practices in Chinese construction projectsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage05016012-1en_US
dc.identifier.epage05016012-10en_US
dc.identifier.volume143en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000314en_US
dcterms.abstractCollusion is of critical concern to the construction sector as it undermines free competition in the construction market. Given that previous research on collusive practices concentrates mainly on the bidding phase, this study extended the research focus to the entire construction period and aimed to investigate specific collusive practices in Chinese construction projects. A total of 22 specific collusive practices in Chinese construction projects were first identified based on a comprehensive literature review and a Delphi survey with 15 industry experts. Then, a questionnaire survey was conducted to prioritize the identified collusive practices in terms of their probability and severity. The survey results indicate that the primary collusive practices in Chinese construction projects are misrepresentation of qualification certificates, loose site supervision, misusing prequalification requirements, fake tendering, approval of the unnecessary change orders, collective collusive tendering by helping one another, the nomination of a particular supplier, issuing certified works falsely, and inflating tender price. The findings of the study not only provide a clearer picture of collusive practices in construction projects in China but also provide a better understanding of collusive practices in other emerging economies.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, July 2017, v. 143, no. 3, 05016012, p. 1-10en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of professional issues in engineering education and practiceen_US
dcterms.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85016211413-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5541en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0938-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6734841-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chan_Understanding_Collusive_Practices.pdfPre-Published version1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

109
Last Week
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

403
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

63
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

52
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.