Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103415
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Professional Education and Executive Development-
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorWan, Cen_US
dc.creatorShen, GQen_US
dc.creatorChoi, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:33:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:33:46Z-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103415-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2018). Differential public support for waste management policy: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 477-488 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.060.en_US
dc.subjectPolicy supporten_US
dc.subjectPublic acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectRecyclingen_US
dc.subjectSocial groupsen_US
dc.subjectWaste chargingen_US
dc.titleDifferential public support for waste management policy : the case of Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage477en_US
dc.identifier.epage488en_US
dc.identifier.volume175en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.060en_US
dcterms.abstractGaining public support for environmental policy can promote pro-environmental behaviors and facilitate policy implementation. A telephone survey was conducted in Hong Kong to solicit 504 respondents’ level of support for different waste management policies and to investigate the role of key socio-demographic variables in influencing the level of support for these policies. Data was examined by using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Findings revealed that variance in policy support for different measures differs significantly across gender, age groups, and education level, while household size and political inclination exhibited less association with support for the policies. Respondents also indicated a varying level of support across policy tools, with policies of developing recycling industry and extending Producer Responsibility Scheme received more support, but municipal solid waste charging scheme and publicity and education measure were less welcomed by respondents. Our analysis infers that current waste management framework should be driven toward a more coherent mode in order to secure greater public support and maximize policy effectiveness. Policy implications could be applied to waste management framework development in cities which share similar background with Hong Kong.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of cleaner production, 20 Feb. 2018, v. 175, p. 477-488en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of cleaner productionen_US
dcterms.issued2018-02-20-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85039870126-
dc.description.validate202312 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0807-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6809909-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shen_Differential_Public_Support.pdfPre-Published version1.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

137
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

252
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

37
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.