Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103357
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorYeung, JSKen_US
dc.creatorYam, MCHen_US
dc.creatorWong, YLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:33:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:33:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103357-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yeung, J. S., Yam, M. C., & Wong, Y. L. (2019). 1-Year development trend of concrete compressive strength using Calcium Sulfoaluminate cement blended with OPC, PFA and GGBS. Construction and Building Materials, 198, 527-536 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.182.en_US
dc.subjectBinder materialsen_US
dc.subjectCalcium Sulfoaluminate Cement (CSAC)en_US
dc.subjectEarly ettringite formationen_US
dc.subjectGround Granulated Blastfurnace Slag (GGBS)en_US
dc.subjectOrdinary Portland Cement (OPC)en_US
dc.subjectPulverized Fuel Ash (PFA)en_US
dc.subjectStrength development trenden_US
dc.title1-Year development trend of concrete compressive strength using Calcium Sulfoaluminate cement blended with OPC, PFA and GGBSen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage527en_US
dc.identifier.epage536en_US
dc.identifier.volume198en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.182en_US
dcterms.abstractIn recent years, Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement (CSAC) has become widely used in concrete repair works due to its outstanding properties of volume stability and rapid strength gain. Nevertheless, with the increasing concerns on cost and the embodied carbon of concrete, people start considering the possibility of blended combination of CSAC with less costly Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and more environmental friendly binder materials like Pulverized Fuel Ash (PFA) or Ground Granulated Blastfurnace Slag (GGBS). However, due to the completely different hydration process of CSAC comparing with OPC, reactions of CSAC with these binder materials have not yet been fully understood so far through systematic research, notwithstanding that numerous studies have been done on the strength development trend of concrete with OPC blended with PFA or GGBS. The objective of this research is to determine the long-term strength development trend of concrete using different combinations of CSAC with OPC, PFA & GGBS and to derive empirical equations for predicting early and later strengths of concretes with various binder combinations incorporating CSAC at different ages. A test regime consisting of totally 20 concrete mixes was conducted to examine the effect of different binder combinations on the concrete compressive strength at different ages from 2 h up to one year (365 days). The test results show that with the same total binder content, concrete mixes with increasing percentage content of CSAC exhibit increasing early strength. For concrete mixes with combination of CSAC with PFA or GGBS only, their concrete compressive strengths at later ages drop significantly when OPC is not present. This is believed to be the result of lacking of calcium hydroxide, which is the hydration product of OPC, to activate the hydraulic properties of PFA or GGBS to contribute in strength development. Nevertheless, it is found that a small quantity down to 5% of OPC is already adequate to bring the long-term strength at 365 days up to the same order as that of ordinary pure OPC concrete. Equations are derived for the prediction of strength performance of concrete with various binder combinations at different ages for the consideration of engineers at design or planning stage. Outcome of this research is able to give a picture for the strength development trends of concretes with different percentage combinations of CSAC with commonly used binder materials. The derived equations also give valuable information at the design stage for engineers to determine suitable percentage of different binder materials in concrete to be used giving a balance of benefits in the aspects of strength performance at early and long-term stages as well as economic and environmental considerations.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationConstruction and building materials, 20 Feb. 2019, v. 198, p. 527-536en_US
dcterms.isPartOfConstruction and building materialsen_US
dcterms.issued2019-02-20-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057853677-
dc.description.validate202312 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0639-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24420537-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yam_1-Year_Development_Trend.pdfPre-Published version1.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

147
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

78
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

38
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.