Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103293
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorWang, Fen_US
dc.creatorLi, Hen_US
dc.creatorDong, Cen_US
dc.creatorDing, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:32:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:32:57Z-
dc.identifier.issn0951-8320en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103293-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, F., Li, H., Dong, C., & Ding, L. (2019). Knowledge representation using non-parametric Bayesian networks for tunneling risk analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 191, 106529 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106529.en_US
dc.subjectExpert systemen_US
dc.subjectNon-parametric Bayesian networksen_US
dc.subjectRisk analysisen_US
dc.subjectStructured expert judgmenten_US
dc.subjectTunnelingen_US
dc.titleKnowledge representation using non-parametric Bayesian networks for tunneling risk analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume191en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ress.2019.106529en_US
dcterms.abstractKnowledge capture and reuse are critical in the risk management of tunneling works. Bayesian networks (BNs) are promising for knowledge representation due to their ability to integrate domain knowledge, encode causal relationships, and update models when evidence is available. However, the model development based on classic BNs is challenging when expert opinions are solicited due to the discretization of variables and quantification of large conditional probability tables. This study applies non-parametric BNs, which only require the elicitation of the marginal distribution corresponding to each node and correlation coefficient associated with each edge, to develop a knowledge-based expert system for tunneling risk analysis. In particular, we propose to use the pair-wise Pearson's linear correlations to parameterize the model because the assessment is intuitive and experts in the engineering domain are more familiar and comfortable with this notion. However, when Spearman's rank correlation is given, the method can also be used by modification of the marginals. The method is illustrated with a tunnel case in the Wuhan metro project. The expert knowledge of risk assessment for common failures in shield tunneling is integrated and visualized. The developed model is validated by real documented accidents. Potential applications of the model are also explored, such as decision support for risk-based design.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationReliability engineering and system safety, Nov. 2019, v. 191, 106529en_US
dcterms.isPartOfReliability engineering and system safetyen_US
dcterms.issued2019-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067023699-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0836en_US
dc.identifier.artn106529en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0487-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS15442620-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Knowledge_Representation_Using.pdfPre-Published version4.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

125
Last Week
12
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

75
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

33
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.