Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103238
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorZakikhani, Ken_US
dc.creatorZayed, Ten_US
dc.creatorAbdrabou, Ben_US
dc.creatorSenouci, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:32:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:32:34Z-
dc.identifier.issn0887-3828en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103238-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001368.en_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural networken_US
dc.subjectFailure source predictionen_US
dc.subjectMultinomial logiten_US
dc.subjectOil pipelinesen_US
dc.subjectRegressionen_US
dc.titleModeling failure of oil pipelinesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage10en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001368en_US
dcterms.abstractAs the safest means of transporting gas and hazardous materials, pipelines transport invaluable petroleum material. However, a considerable number of accidents have happened involving these facilities, leading to economic losses and environmental impacts. Several inspection techniques are used to provide safety for pipelines. Despite their accuracy, these techniques are time-consuming and costly. Some failure prediction and condition assessment models were recently developed to tackle these inefficiencies. However, most of these models only predict one failure source or they rely on subjective expert surveys. This research developed three objective models based on artificial neural network (ANN) and multinominal logit (MNL) regression to predict failure sources in oil pipelines. An ANN model was developed for prediction among mechanical, corrosion, and third-party failures with an average validity percentage (AVP) of 73.7%. Another ANN model was developed for prediction between corrosion or third-party failures with an AVP of 72.8%. In addition, an MNL model was developed for prediction among mechanical, corrosion, and third-party failures with an AVP of 73.7%. Pipeline operators and decision makers can use these models to identify pipeline failure sources. They can also be applied to prioritize in-line inspection to carry out appropriate maintenance.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of performance of constructed facilities, Feb. 2020, v. 34, no. 1, 04019088, p. 1-10en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of performance of constructed facilitiesen_US
dcterms.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074529487-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5509en_US
dc.identifier.artn04019088en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0375-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24312908-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zayed_Modeling_Failure_Oil.pdfPre-Published version977.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

68
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

142
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.