Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103200
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorZafar, Ien_US
dc.creatorWuni, IYen_US
dc.creatorShen, GQen_US
dc.creatorZahoor, Hen_US
dc.creatorXue, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:32:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:32:17Z-
dc.identifier.issn0964-0568en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103200-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2019 Newcastle Universityen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management on 28 Oct 2019 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09640568.2019.1672524.en_US
dc.subjectCPECen_US
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectHighway alignmenten_US
dc.subjectStakeholdersen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleA decision support framework for sustainable highway alignment embracing variant preferences of stakeholders : case of China Pakistan economic corridoren_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1550en_US
dc.identifier.epage1584en_US
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09640568.2019.1672524en_US
dcterms.abstractThe selection of highway alignment without explicit consideration of the interests and preferences of stakeholders is a major recipe for conflicts and opposition in highway projects. Given the complex and dynamic nature of the highway alignment decision atmosphere, a dynamic framework is imperative. This research evaluated three multi-criteria decision methods (MCDMs), identified the optimal combination and proposed a highway alignment decision support framework which embraces the preferences of stakeholders. The proposed framework was validated using a controversial ongoing mega highway project from the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Thus, the study makes a useful contribution to the praxis and practice of the highway alignment decision-making process.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of environmental planning and management, 2020, v. 63, no. 9, p. 1550-1584en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of environmental planning and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074560029-
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0559en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0288-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24252461-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zafar_Decision_Support_Framework.pdfPre-Published version4.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

70
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

50
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.