Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103119
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: How to choose a better envelope design? A balance between energy and daylighting performance
Authors: Xue, P
Xie, J
Liu, J
Mak, C 
Issue Date: 2017
Source: Procedia engineering, 2017, v. 205, p. 1027-1033
Abstract: Daylight has two characteristics: radiometry and photometry. Hong Kong is situated just south of the Tropic of Cancer and receives a lot of daylight which could generate more lighting energy savings but bring solar heat gain at the same time. This study appealed that the energy-efficient design should guarantee residents' luminous comfort level first. A dynamic daylight metric, average DA300 (Daylight Autonomy), was first tested to quantify occupants' luminous comfort by using statistical analysis with the data from questionnaire survey and climate-based simulation of 108 unit cases. The benchmark of Ave. DA300 is then found as 29.6 %. A new parameter EDR (Energy Daylight Rate) was also proposed to reflect the relation between daylighting performance and energy performance. Case study was conducted to optimize the green features' design and validate the utilization of EDR. The result showed the EDR could help optimize the envelope design at the early stage.
Keywords: Daylight autonomy
Energy-saving
Luminous comfort
Statistical analysis
Uniformity
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Procedia engineering 
EISSN: 1877-7058
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.166
Description: 10th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, ISHVAC2017, 19-22 October 2017, Jinan, China
Rights: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The following publication Xue, P., Xie, J., Liu, J., & Mak, C. (2017). How to choose a better envelope design? A balance between energy and daylighting performance. Procedia Engineering, 205, 1027-1033 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.166.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1877705817347227-main.pdf2.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

88
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

29
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.