Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103118
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering | en_US |
dc.creator | Sun, J | en_US |
dc.creator | Li, Z | en_US |
dc.creator | Xiao, F | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-28T03:27:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-28T03:27:12Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103118 | - |
dc.description | 10th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, ISHVAC2017, 19-22 October 2017, Jinan, China | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.rights | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Sun, J., Li, Z., & Xiao, F. (2017). Analysis of Typical Meteorological Year selection for energy simulation of building with daylight utilization. Procedia Engineering, 205, 3080-3087 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.303. | en_US |
dc.subject | Building energy simulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Daylight utilization | en_US |
dc.subject | Typical Meteorological Year | en_US |
dc.title | Analysis of Typical Meteorological Year selection for energy simulation of building with daylight utilization | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 3080 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 3087 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 205 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.303 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Selecting suitable weather data is the premise of getting valid conclusion from building energy simulation. By analyzing the generation process of Typical Meteorological Year (TMY), this paper points out that existing well-accepted TMY generation methodologies mainly emphasis the thermal aspect of climatic environment during their typicality selecting process. Light aspect has not been taken into consideration. A case study is carried out to explore whether there would be a divergence of conclusion when conducting daylight-related simulations with different TMY data. Performance metrics including Daylight Factor (DF), Daylight Autonomy (DA), Useful Daylight Index (UDI) and daylight illuminance distribution have been compared. The result indicates that for static metric as DF, the variation between using different TMY data is insignificant. However, for dynamic metrics such as DA, UDI and illuminance distribution, the divergence is obvious. Researchers are suggested to take caution of this effect when comparing simulation conclusions from different studies. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Procedia engineering, 2017, v. 205, p. 3080-3087 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Procedia engineering | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85033360574 | - |
dc.relation.conference | International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning [ISHVAC] | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1877-7058 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202311 bckw | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | BEEE-0851 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Not mention | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 6911800 | - |
dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1877705817349688-main.pdf | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
91
Citations as of May 11, 2025
Downloads
68
Citations as of May 11, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
16
Citations as of May 8, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.