Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103118
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorSun, Jen_US
dc.creatorLi, Zen_US
dc.creatorXiao, Fen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T03:27:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-28T03:27:12Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103118-
dc.description10th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, ISHVAC2017, 19-22 October 2017, Jinan, Chinaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Sun, J., Li, Z., & Xiao, F. (2017). Analysis of Typical Meteorological Year selection for energy simulation of building with daylight utilization. Procedia Engineering, 205, 3080-3087 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.303.en_US
dc.subjectBuilding energy simulationen_US
dc.subjectDaylight utilizationen_US
dc.subjectTypical Meteorological Yearen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Typical Meteorological Year selection for energy simulation of building with daylight utilizationen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage3080en_US
dc.identifier.epage3087en_US
dc.identifier.volume205en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.303en_US
dcterms.abstractSelecting suitable weather data is the premise of getting valid conclusion from building energy simulation. By analyzing the generation process of Typical Meteorological Year (TMY), this paper points out that existing well-accepted TMY generation methodologies mainly emphasis the thermal aspect of climatic environment during their typicality selecting process. Light aspect has not been taken into consideration. A case study is carried out to explore whether there would be a divergence of conclusion when conducting daylight-related simulations with different TMY data. Performance metrics including Daylight Factor (DF), Daylight Autonomy (DA), Useful Daylight Index (UDI) and daylight illuminance distribution have been compared. The result indicates that for static metric as DF, the variation between using different TMY data is insignificant. However, for dynamic metrics such as DA, UDI and illuminance distribution, the divergence is obvious. Researchers are suggested to take caution of this effect when comparing simulation conclusions from different studies.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationProcedia engineering, 2017, v. 205, p. 3080-3087en_US
dcterms.isPartOfProcedia engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85033360574-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning [ISHVAC]en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1877-7058en_US
dc.description.validate202311 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0851-
dc.description.fundingSourceNot mentionen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6911800-
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1877705817349688-main.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

91
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

68
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Citations as of May 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Citations as of May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.