Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103081
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineering-
dc.creatorCheung, Hen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T03:26:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-28T03:26:59Z-
dc.identifier.issn1948-5085en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103081-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineersen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 by ASMEen_US
dc.rightsThis manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication: Cheung, H., & Wang, S. (2018). Impact of Dynamics on the Accuracies of Different Experimental Data-Processing Methods for Steady-State Heat Transfer Rate Measurement. Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, 10(2), 021008, copyright © ASME. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037543.en_US
dc.subjectDynamicsen_US
dc.subjectHeat transfer rateen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory measurementen_US
dc.subjectSteady-stateen_US
dc.subjectUncertaintyen_US
dc.titleImpact of dynamics on the accuracies of different experimental data-processing methods for steady-state heat transfer rate measurementen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4037543en_US
dcterms.abstractIt is becoming often to measure steady-state heat transfer rate from thermal systems with variable speed and volume equipment and hence with fluctuating properties and mass flow rates. However, it is unclear if the conventional heat transfer rate measurement based on averages of temperature and pressure measurement is representative enough to represent the effect of system dynamics and measure their heat transfer rates accurately. This paper studied the issue by comparing its accuracy and uncertainty to that of alternative data-processing methods with theoretically less systematic bias. The comparison was conducted with steady-state data from a variable-speed ductless heat pump (DHP) system with occasional fluctuation of refrigerant flow and properties. The results show that the accuracy improvement brought by one alternative method is statistically significant albeit small in magnitude, and the other method may reduce uncertainty of the heat transfer rate measurement in tests with large periodic changes of measured variables. Nonetheless, both alternative methods are about 100 times more computationally expensive than the conventional averaging method, and averages of temperature and pressure measurement are still appropriate when computational resources are limited.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of thermal science and engineering applications, Apr. 2018, v. 10, no. 2, 021008en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of thermal science and engineering applicationsen_US
dcterms.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029541469-
dc.identifier.artn021008en_US
dc.description.validate202311 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0507-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6782860-
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cheung_Impact_Dynamics_Accuracies.pdfPre-Published version1.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

74
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

58
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.