Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102959
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLu, Yen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorYan, Cen_US
dc.creatorHuang, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:59:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:59:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102959-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lu, Y., Wang, S., Yan, C., & Huang, Z. (2017). Robust optimal design of renewable energy system in nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertainties. Applied Energy, 187, 62-71 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.042.en_US
dc.subjectMismatch ratioen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo simulationen_US
dc.subjectNet zero energy buildingen_US
dc.subjectRobust designen_US
dc.titleRobust optimal design of renewable energy system in nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertaintiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage62en_US
dc.identifier.epage71en_US
dc.identifier.volume187en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.042en_US
dcterms.abstractIt is acknowledged that the conventional design methods can easily lead to oversized system or unsatisfactory performance for different design conditions. Most existing studies on design optimization of net zero energy building (nZEB) are conducted based on deterministic data/information. However, the question is: How is the actual performance of a design nZEB in different years considering uncertainties? This study, therefore, proposed a robust design method for sizing renewable energy systems in nZEB concerning uncertainties in renewable resources and demand load. The proposed robust design method is applied to the planning of renewable energy system for the Hong Kong Zero Carbon Building. The annual performance of nZEB under the optimal design options are systematically investigated and compared using the proposed robust design method and the deterministic method. It is meaningful to obtain a fitting formula to identify the relationship between the probability of achieving annual zero energy balance and the design mismatch ratio. On the basis of Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation methods, the uncertainty of nZEB performance is quantified which provides flexibility for designers in selecting appropriate design options according to the required probability of achieving nZEB during the design stage.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationApplied energy, 1 Feb. 2017, v. 187, p. 62-71en_US
dcterms.isPartOfApplied energyen_US
dcterms.issued2017-02-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84996549058-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9118en_US
dc.description.validate202310 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0652-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNatural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6698140-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Robust_Optimal_Design.pdfPre-Published version1.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

115
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

92
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

103
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

90
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.