Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102940
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorYang, Den_US
dc.creatorMak, CMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:58:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:58:55Z-
dc.identifier.issn0003-682Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102940-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserveden_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yang, D., & Mak, C. M. (2017). An assessment model of classroom acoustical environment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Applied Acoustics, 127, 292-296 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.022.en_US
dc.subjectAcoustical environmenten_US
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectAssessment modelen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy comprehensive evaluationen_US
dc.titleAn assessment model of classroom acoustical environment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methoden_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage292en_US
dc.identifier.epage296en_US
dc.identifier.volume127en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.022en_US
dcterms.abstractIn this paper, an assessment model based on multi-layer fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method (FCE) of classroom acoustical environment is proposed. The model classifies five major factors affecting overall assessment model into several subsets alternatives. The weightings of these main criteria and alternatives were collected through questionnaires among students based on analytic hierarchy process methodology (AHP). An evaluation score was calculated from the proposed model with the weightings generated from AHP method. In this paper, classrooms in the Hong Kong Polytechnic University were used to develop the assessment model. The result shows that the evaluation score of PolyU classrooms is about 87.2, which refers to “Good” evaluation set. It indicates that classrooms in PolyU needs to be improved. The weightings generated from AHP method can be considered for the importance of each alternatives. The assessment model can provide proper recommendation to universities for acoustic treatment so as to increase the acoustic quality of the educational environment.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationApplied acoustics, 1 Dec. 2017, v. 127, p. 292-296en_US
dcterms.isPartOfApplied acousticsen_US
dcterms.issued2017-12-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021760487-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-910Xen_US
dc.description.validate202310 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0574-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6757920-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mak_Assessment_Model_Classroom.pdfPre-Published version784.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

119
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Dec 21, 2025

Downloads

131
Citations as of Dec 21, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

44
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.