Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102864
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Sustainable Urban Developmenten_US
dc.creatorAnsah, MKen_US
dc.creatorChen, Xen_US
dc.creatorYang, Hen_US
dc.creatorLu, Len_US
dc.creatorLam, PTIen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:58:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:58:17Z-
dc.identifier.issn2210-6707en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102864-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ansah, M. K., Chen, X., Yang, H., Lu, L., & Lam, P. T. I. (2020). An integrated life cycle assessment of different façade systems for a typical residential building in ghana. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101974 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101974.en_US
dc.subjectCumulative energy demandsen_US
dc.subjectFaçadeen_US
dc.subjectGlobal warming potentialen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectLife cycle costen_US
dc.titleAn integrated life cycle assessment of different façade systems for a typical residential building in Ghanaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scs.2019.101974en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study performs a comparative environmental and economic assessment of four different façade systems for low-cost residential buildings in Ghana. A framework is designed to incorporate BIM, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) to perform a holistic comparison of a Shotcrete Insulated Composite Façade (Shotcrete ICF), Galvanised Steel Insulated Composite façade (G. Steel ICF) and Stabilised Earth Block Façade (SEBF) against the conventional Concrete Block and Mortar Façade (CBMF). BIM models are developed to compute the environmental and economic impacts of each façade. The results are then subjected to a comparative analysis for different life cycle stages. The SEBF is proved to be the most sustainable facade as it reduces cumulative energy demand (CED) by 39.13 %, global warming potential (GWP) by 18.07 % and LCC by 47.87 % compared to CBMF. The Shotcrete IFC and G. Steel IFC are found to increase CED but decrease GWP. Other than the SEBF, the ranking of all façades under different indicators changes through the scenario analysis. The findings of this study provide useful guidelines for selecting facade systems and reducing the environmental and economic impacts of low-cost residential buildings in Ghana.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable cities and society, Feb. 2020, v. 53, 101974en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable cities and societyen_US
dcterms.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075524192-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-6715en_US
dc.identifier.artn101974en_US
dc.description.validate202311 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0283-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS15597899-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ansah_Integrated_Life_Cycle.pdfPre-Published version1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

131
Last Week
6
Last month
Citations as of Dec 21, 2025

Downloads

113
Citations as of Dec 21, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

77
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

66
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.