Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102855
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorMa, KWen_US
dc.creatorMak, CMen_US
dc.creatorWong, HMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:58:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:58:13Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102855-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ma, K. W., Mak, C. M., & Wong, H. M. (2020). Development of a subjective scale for sound quality assessments in building acoustics. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101177 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101177.en_US
dc.subjectAcoustic subjective scaleen_US
dc.subjectBuilding acousticsen_US
dc.subjectPsychoacousticsen_US
dc.subjectSemantic deferential methoden_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a subjective scale for sound quality assessments in building acousticsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101177en_US
dcterms.abstractIn building acoustics, it is necessary to conduct both objective and subjective evaluations in a holistic sound quality assessment. However, there is a huge variety in a selection of psychological tools. This arouses the concern about reliability and validity of the tools. Although various perceptions can be affected by environmental sounds, the underlying structure of acoustic perceptual influences was recently investigated by the researchers in their systematic review study. This is a first study aiming at the development of a valid and reliable subjective scale to quantitatively assess the three fundamental perceptual dimensions of sound via the investigation of its psychometric properties. Nine semantic differential questions in the psychoacoustics perception scale (PPS) covered the assessments about the subjects' responses to the general judgement (Evaluation (E)), energy content (Potency (P)), and temporal and spectral content (Activity (A)) of sound. The reliability test results (Cronbach's αs > 0.80) indicated the acceptable internal consistencies of the items in the E, P, and A factors. The construct validity in characterizing the structure of perceptual influences was confirmed by the goodness-of-model-fit indexes in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, N = 128) for the factorial structure of the hypothetical EPA model behind the PPS. The further invariant tests verified the invariances of the model across gender except the error variance of the E factor. A total EPA score, representing the joint attribution of the factors, was a significant predictor of the other perceptions. The concurrent validity of the PPS to the modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS), a well-developed psychometric tool, was also supported by the result that the E factor was a significant predictor of the MDAS score.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of building engineering, May 2020, v. 29, 101177en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of building engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078573482-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-7102en_US
dc.identifier.artn101177en_US
dc.description.validate202311 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0250-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS28677418-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mak_Development_Subjective_Scale.pdfPre-Published version1.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

112
Last Week
9
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

191
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.