Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102809
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, Men_US
dc.creatorPeng, Jen_US
dc.creatorLuo, Yen_US
dc.creatorShen, Zen_US
dc.creatorYang, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:57:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:57:56Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102809-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, M., Peng, J., Luo, Y., Shen, Z., & Yang, H. (2021). Comparison of different simplistic prediction models for forecasting PV power output: Assessment with experimental measurements. Energy, 224, 120162 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120162.en_US
dc.subjectOne-diode modelen_US
dc.subjectPV module modelen_US
dc.subjectPV technologiesen_US
dc.subjectSimple efficiency modelen_US
dc.subjectTemperature correction modelen_US
dc.titleComparison of different simplistic prediction models for forecasting PV power output : assessment with experimental measurementsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume224en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2021.120162en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper tested the energy outputs of different types of PV modules and evaluated the accuracies of different simplistic PV module power prediction models. A test rig was developed in Hong Kong to assess the PV power outputs of ten PV modules. The solar radiation, ambient temperature and power generation are recorded. The evaluated models include simple efficiency model, temperature correction model and one-diode model. The results show that the mono-Si PV module is the highest in terms of the annual energy outputs per unit area, and a-Si PV modules is the lowest. The simple efficiency model over-estimates the power output of all types of PV modules for more than 10% except for a CdTe PV module. The one-diode model demonstrated the highest accuracy for mono-Si and poly-Si PV modules. The accuracies of the evaluated models are low for thin-film PV technologies. Although the mean bias error of the one-diode model is larger than 10% for the thin-film PV modules (expect for one CdTe PV module), the one-diode model has the highest accuracy among the three models. Further studies should be conducted to investigate the energy performance of thin-film PV modules and then improve their prediction accuracy.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnergy, 1 June 2021, v. 224, 120162en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEnergyen_US
dcterms.issued2021-06-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101642411-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6785en_US
dc.identifier.artn120162en_US
dc.description.validate202310 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0081-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Electrical and Mechanical Services Departmenten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS49644687-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shen_Comparison_Different_Simplistic.pdfPre-Published version5.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

116
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

190
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

85
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

68
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.