Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102615
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorHui, HHTen_US
dc.creatorLam, HKWen_US
dc.creatorTam, MLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-26T07:19:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-26T07:19:53Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-9-881-58146-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102615-
dc.description22nd International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies: Transport and Society, HKSTS 2017 - Hong Kong, 9-11 Dec 2017en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Society for Transportation Studies Limiteden_US
dc.rightsReprinted from 22nd International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies: Transport and Society, HKSTS 2017, Hui, H. H., Lam, W. H., & Tam, M. L., Evaluation of different energy storage systems for electric bus operation, p. 109-116, Copyright (2017), with permission from Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies.en_US
dc.subjectElectric busen_US
dc.subjectEnergy storage systemen_US
dc.subjectLithium-ion batteryen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of different energy storage systems for electric bus operationen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage109en_US
dc.identifier.epage116en_US
dcterms.abstractOperational trials of battery electric buses (BEBs) have begun on different scales around the world, and lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are usually selected as their power source. In this study, different Li-ion-based energy storage systems were evaluated for electric bus operation. Technical visits were conducted to study the features and performance of BEBs in different cities. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP), lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC), and lithium titanate (LTO) were found to be the most common types of Li-ion batteries adopted for BEBs. The characteristics of these three types of Li-ion batteries are reviewed together with their charging and operation modes. LFP was found to have the highest energy consumption, and LTO had the lowest. The evaluation results show that LTO with the opportunity charging mode is the best choice of energy storage systems for BEBs, particularly in densely populated Asian cities.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransport and Society : Proceeding of the 22nd International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, HKSTS 2017, p. 109-116en_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.relation.ispartofbookTransport and Society : Proceeding of the 22nd International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, HKSTS 2017en_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies [HKSTS]en_US
dc.description.validate202310 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-2310-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextCentral Policy Unit of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development (RISUD) of The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS19491299-
dc.description.oaCategoryPublisher permissionen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hui_Evaluation_Different_Energy.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

93
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

50
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.