Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102563
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLee, CJen_US
dc.creatorWang, Ren_US
dc.creatorLee, CYen_US
dc.creatorHung, CCWen_US
dc.creatorHsu, SCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-26T07:19:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-26T07:19:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn0742-597Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102563-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000593.en_US
dc.subjectBoard compositionen_US
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen_US
dc.subjectCorporate misconducten_US
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibilityen_US
dc.titleBoard structure and directors' role in preventing corporate misconduct in the construction industryen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000593en_US
dcterms.abstractThe control of corporate misconduct has become one of the most significant challenges facing society today. Every year hundreds of firms are prosecuted for illegal behavior. Although there is growing interest in corporate governance, there is minimal research on how it influences corporate misconduct. This study draws on organization economics and the strategic management literature to empirically investigate the relationship between board characteristics and firm misconduct. Using panel data on 45 publicly listed Taiwan construction companies between 2005 and 2014, the regression analysis revealed four findings of particular interest. First, multiple directorships have a U-shaped effect on illegal corporate acts. Second, experience diversity has a significant role in preventing corporate misconduct. Third, the impact of education diversity is positive and significant on firms' illegal behaviors, implying that similar education background for directors could benefit corporate misconduct prevention. Finally, directors' education level only has a limited effect, which may be explained by the characteristics of the construction industry.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of management in engineering, Mar. 2018, v. 34, no. 2, 04017067en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of management in engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2018-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85040117208-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5479en_US
dc.identifier.artn04017067en_US
dc.description.validate202310 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-1886-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6811085-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hsu_Board_Structure_Role.pdfPre-Published version1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

106
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

141
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.