Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102424
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorAnwar, GAen_US
dc.creatorDong, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-26T07:18:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-26T07:18:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn1671-3664en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102424-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use(https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0580-z.en_US
dc.subjectNon-ductileen_US
dc.subjectPerformance-baseden_US
dc.subjectReinforced-concreteen_US
dc.subjectResilienceen_US
dc.subjectSeismic retrofiten_US
dc.titleSeismic resilience of retrofitted RC buildingsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage561en_US
dc.identifier.epage571en_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11803-020-0580-zen_US
dcterms.abstractExisting buildings can be at a greater seismic risk due to non-conformance to current design codes and may require structural retrofitting to improve building performance. The performance of buildings is measured in terms of immediate consequences due to direct damage, but the continuing impacts related to recovery are not considered in seismic retrofit assessment. This paper introduces a framework of retrofit selection based on the seismic resilience of deficient buildings retrofitted with the conventional mitigation approaches. The assembly-based methodology is considered for the seismic resilience assessment by compiling a nonlinear numerical model and a building performance model. The collapse fragility is developed from the capacity curve, and the resulting social, economic, and environmental consequences are determined. The seismic resilience of a building is assessed by developing a downtime assessment methodology incorporating sequence of repairs, impeding factors, and utility availability. Five functionality states are developed for the building functionality given investigated time interval, and a functionality curve for each retrofit is determined. It is concluded that seismic resilience can be used as a performance indicator to assess the continuing impacts of a hazard for the retrofit selection.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEarthquake engineering and engineering vibration, July 2020, v. 19, no. 3, p. 561-571en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEarthquake engineering and engineering vibrationen_US
dcterms.issued2020-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087966679-
dc.description.validate202310 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-0806-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24987714-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Anwar_Seismic_Resilience_Retrofitted.pdfPre-Published version1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

98
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

104
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.