Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102295
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorZhang, Zen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Jen_US
dc.creatorDeng, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T07:50:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-18T07:50:57Z-
dc.identifier.issn1674-7755en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102295-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisher科学出版社 (Kexue Chubanshe,Science Press)en_US
dc.rights© 2023 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., & Deng, J. (2023). A comparative study for determining rock joint normal stiffness with destructive uniaxial compression and nondestructive ultrasonic wave testing. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(7), 1700-1712 is availale at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.010.en_US
dc.subjectNormal stiffnessen_US
dc.subjectRock jointen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic waveen_US
dc.subjectUniaxial compressionen_US
dc.titleA comparative study for determining rock joint normal stiffness with destructive uniaxial compression and nondestructive ultrasonic wave testingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1700en_US
dc.identifier.epage1712en_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.010en_US
dcterms.abstractRock joint a kind of vital discontinuities in natural rock mass. How to accurately and conveniently determine joint normal stiffness is therefore significant in rock mechanics. Here, first, seven existing methods for determining joint normal stiffness were introduced and reviewed, among which Method I (the indirect measurement method), Method II (the direct determination method), Method III (the across-joint strain gauge measurement method) and Method IV (the deformation measuring ring method) are via destructive uniaxial compression testing, while Method V (the best fitting method), Method VI (the rapid evaluation method) and Method VII (the effective modulus method) are through wave propagation principles and nondestructive ultrasonic testing. Subsequently, laboratory tests of intact and jointed sandstone specimens were conducted following the testing requirements and procedures of those seven methods. A comparison among those methods was then performed. The results show that Method I, i.e. the benchmark method, is reliable and stable. Method II has a conceptual drawback, and its accuracy is acceptable at only very low stress levels. Relative errors in the results from Method III are very large. With Method IV, the testing results are sufficiently accurate despite the strict testing environment and complicated testing procedures. The results from Method V are greatly unstable and significantly dependent on the natural frequency of the transducers. The joint normal stiffness determined with Method VI is stable and accurate, although data processing is complex. Method VII could be adopted to determine the joint normal stiffness corresponding to the rock elastic deformation phase only. Consequently, it is suggested that Methods I, IV and VI should be adopted for the measurement of joint normal stiffness. The findings could be helpful in selecting an appropriate method to determine joint normal stiffness and, hence, to better solve discontinuous rock mass problems.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering, July 2023, v. 15, no. 7, p. 1700-1712en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2023-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143877619-
dc.identifier.eissn2589-0417en_US
dc.description.validate202310 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of China; National Key Research and Development Program of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1674775522002207-main.pdf2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

114
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

125
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.