Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102202
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Fashion and Textilesen_US
dc.creatorLuo, Xen_US
dc.creatorLi, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-12T02:21:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-12T02:21:46Z-
dc.identifier.issn0040-5175en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102202-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Luo, X., & Li, L. (2020). Design of quantification methods for cross-sectional uniformity of functional fiber blended yarns. In Textile Research Journal (Vol. 90, Issues 15–16, pp. 1872–1880) Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0040517520901700.en_US
dc.subjectFiber distributionen_US
dc.subjectFunctional textileen_US
dc.subjectImage processingen_US
dc.subjectManagement of systemsen_US
dc.subjectYarn spinningen_US
dc.titleDesign of quantification methods for cross-sectional uniformity of functional fiber blended yarnsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1872en_US
dc.identifier.epage1880en_US
dc.identifier.volume90en_US
dc.identifier.issue15-16en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0040517520901700en_US
dcterms.abstractThe fiber distribution in yarn structure influences the mechanical, aesthetic, and functional properties of textile products, but methods for characterizing this distribution remain limited. The uniformity of fiber distribution is mostly quantified by the blend irregularity and migration index. Asymmetric and segregated distributions are commonly identified in cross sections of fibers in yarn; however, detecting uniform, wrapped, or core distributions in side-view images is challenging. Therefore, a more effective and versatile method is required for the quantification of cross-sectional uniformity in blended yarns. In this study, two methods for quantifying fiber distribution uniformity were proposed and evaluated. In the window variation method (WVM), which is based on cell counting, windows are randomly selected, and the uniformity of one type of fiber in a yarn cross section calculated according to the variation of the fiber ratio in each window. In the dilation method (DLM), uniformity is quantified according to the dilation area of the targeted fiber. To evaluate these quantification methods, we conducted antibacterial performance tests on 12 chitosan/cotton yarn samples and compared the results with indexes. Comparison of the two methods reveals that the WVM exhibits greater potential because the threshold yarn area ratio and the weights of the corresponding windows can be programmed to achieve certain quantification goals, while the DLM is simple and fast, with fewer variables than the WVM.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTextile research journal, Aug. 2020, v. 90, no. 15-16, p. 1872-1880en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTextile research journalen_US
dcterms.issued2020-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079464032-
dc.identifier.eissn1746-7748en_US
dc.description.validate202310 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberITC-0272-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS52214602-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Luo_Design_Quantification_Methods.pdfPre-Published version1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

72
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

74
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.