Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101775
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering | en_US |
| dc.creator | Phoon, KK | en_US |
| dc.creator | Cao, ZJ | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ji, J | en_US |
| dc.creator | Leung, YF | en_US |
| dc.creator | Najjar, S | en_US |
| dc.creator | Shuku, T | en_US |
| dc.creator | Tang, C | en_US |
| dc.creator | Yin, ZY | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ikumasa, Y | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ching, J | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T07:44:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T07:44:37Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0038-0806 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101775 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2022 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Geotechnical Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Phoon, K. K., Cao, Z. J., Ji, J., Leung, Y. F., Najjar, S., Shuku, T., ... & Ching, J. (2022). Geotechnical uncertainty, modeling, and decision making. Soils and Foundations, 62(5), 101189 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101189. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Burland triangle | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision making | en_US |
| dc.subject | Numerical modeling | en_US |
| dc.subject | Risk management | en_US |
| dc.subject | Uncertainty | en_US |
| dc.title | Geotechnical uncertainty, modeling, and decision making | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 62 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101189 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Modeling only constitutes one aspect of decision making. The prevailing limitation of applying modeling to practice is the absence of explicit consideration of uncertainties. This review paper covers uncertainty quantification (soil properties, stratification, and model performance) and uncertainty calculation with a focus on how it enhances the role of modeling in decision making (reliability analysis, reliability-based design, and inverse analysis). The key output from a reliability analysis is the probability of failure, where “failure” is defined as any condition that does not meet a performance criterion or a set of criteria. In contrast to the global factor of safety, the probability of failure respects both mechanics and statistics, is sensitive to data (thus opening one potential pathway to digital transformation), and it is meaningful for both system and component failures. Resilience engineering requires system level analysis. As such, geotechnical software can provide better decision support by computing the probability of failure/reliability index as one basic output in addition to stresses, strains, forces, and displacements. It is further shown that more critical non-classical failure mechanisms can emerge from spatially variable soils that can escape notice if the engineer were to restrict analysis to conventional homogeneous or layered soil profiles. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Soils and Foundations, Oct. 2022, v. 62, no. 5, 101189 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Soils and foundations | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2022-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85135113753 | - |
| dc.identifier.artn | 101189 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202309 bcvc | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_Scopus/WOS | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Not mention | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S003808062200097X-main.pdf | 1.51 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
167
Last Week
10
10
Last month
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025
Downloads
147
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
148
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
124
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



