Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101671
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorLu, Len_US
dc.creatorZhou, Ken_US
dc.creatorWang, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T07:41:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-18T07:41:15Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/101671-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Lu, Zhou, Wang and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lu, L., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Zhu, S. (2022). Relationship between paternalistic leadership and employee innovation: A meta-analysis among Chinese samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920006 is available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920006.en_US
dc.subjectChinese sampleen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectModeration effecten_US
dc.subjectPaternalistic leadershipen_US
dc.titleRelationship between paternalistic leadership and employee innovation : a meta-analysis among Chinese samplesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920006en_US
dcterms.abstractThe meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between three dimensions of paternalistic leadership and employee innovation in Chinese enterprises. There exists over a decade of empirical research on the influence of paternalistic leadership on employee innovation in China, but the findings from the various studies are not consistent. Sixty-nine studies from 2009 to 2021 were included in the meta-analysis, and 154 effect sizes were examined. The study found that two dimensions of paternalistic leadership (benevolent leadership r = 0.396 and moral leadership r = 0.329) were positively associated with employee innovation. In contrast, the dimension of authoritarian leadership was negatively associated with innovation (r = −0.151). Moderator analyses found that gender, the education level of employees, time, and the type of evaluation served as meaningful moderators. The moderating effects of outcome measure, the type of data collection method, and the type of publication were not significant. We discuss our limitations, implications for future studies, and practical implications for organizational management.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrontiers in Psychology, July 2022, v. 13, 920006en_US
dcterms.isPartOfFrontiers in psychologyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134614100-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078en_US
dc.identifier.artn920006en_US
dc.description.validate202309 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextSocial Science Research Plan of Guangan 2020; Political Science Research Funds of Xiao Ping Executive Leadership Academy, China.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fpsyg-13-920006.pdf665.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

101
Last Week
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

64
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.