Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101262
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorZhou, Yen_US
dc.creatorCheung, CMen_US
dc.creatorHsu, SCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T04:16:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-30T04:16:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-7863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/101262-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhou, Y., Cheung, C. M., & Hsu, S. C. (2017). A dimensional model for describing and differentiating project teams. International journal of project management, 35(6), 1052-1065 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.001.en_US
dc.subjectDifferentiationen_US
dc.subjectDimensional modelen_US
dc.subjectInterdependenceen_US
dc.subjectProject teamsen_US
dc.titleA dimensional model for describing and differentiating project teamsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1052en_US
dc.identifier.epage1065en_US
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.001en_US
dcterms.abstractMost of the existing studies focus on using taxonomic structures to define different project team types; however, little consensus has been reached on the classification. This paper holds that greater consensus could be achieved by using a dimensional scaling approach to describe project teams. Based on the last 35 years of project team research, a conceptual model is presented for describing and differentiating project teams according to seven dimensions: skill differentiation, interdependence, authority differentiation, team size, team longevity, virtuality, and sharedness. In addition, we illustrate the interrelationships among the dimensions. By using this model, we further explain how the 18 types of project teams discussed in the literature could be more effectively presented. Implications of the model as well as its limitations and possible future research directions are also explored.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of project management, Aug. 2017, v. 35, no. 6, p. 1052-1065en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of project managementen_US
dcterms.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018623015-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4634en_US
dc.description.validate202308 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-2130-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6742865-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hsu_Dimensional_Model_Describing.pdfPre-Published version1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

97
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

102
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.