Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101036
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorJin, YFen_US
dc.creatorYin, ZYen_US
dc.creatorYuan, WHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T04:14:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-30T04:14:19Z-
dc.identifier.issn0013-7952en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/101036-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Jin, Y. F., Yin, Z. Y., & Yuan, W. H. (2020). Simulating retrogressive slope failure using two different smoothed particle finite element methods: A comparative study. Engineering Geology, 279, 105870 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105870.en_US
dc.subjectLandslideen_US
dc.subjectLarge deformationen_US
dc.subjectParticle finite element methoden_US
dc.subjectRetrogressive failureen_US
dc.subjectSensitive clayen_US
dc.subjectStrain smoothingen_US
dc.titleSimulating retrogressive slope failure using two different smoothed particle finite element methods : a comparative studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume279en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105870en_US
dcterms.abstractVarious smoothed particle finite element methods (SPFEMs) have been developed to simulate large deformation problems, but their efficiency and accuracy in simulating progressive landslides in sensitive clays have remained unclear. In this study, a series of numerical analyses are carried out to investigate the development of retrogressive landslides by two SPFEMs (an edge-based strain smoothing PFEM, ESPFEM, and a node-based strain smoothing PFEM, NSPFEM) in view of their outstanding performance in large deformation analysis. A strain-softening Mohr–Coulomb (MC) model is adopted to simulate the behaviour of sensitive clays during landslide, assuming a Poisson's ratio of 0.49 to ensure undrained conditions. The influence of mesh density on the development of retrogressive failure is evaluated for two SPFEMs. Numerical analyses of three mesh sizes (0.2 m, 0.15 m and 0.12 m) are carried out sequentially, with all results demonstrating that (1) the spread retrogressive landslides with horsts and grabens can be achieved by both SPFEMs with the adopted soil model, (2) run-out and retrogression distances decrease as mesh density increases for both methods, (3) retrogressive collapse occurs earlier for ESPFEM but is delayed for NSPFEM with increased mesh density, (4) NSPFEM allows faster calculations and reduces mesh dependency problems when compared with ESPFEM and (5) the increase of shape factor can accelerate retrogressive evolution of landslides. Finally, a real landslide in sensitive clay at Sainte-Monique, Quebec, is simulated to demonstrate ESPFEM's computational efficiency and accuracy.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEngineering geology, 20 Dec. 2020, v. 279, 105870en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEngineering geologyen_US
dcterms.issued2020-12-20-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85093982552-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6917en_US
dc.identifier.artn105870en_US
dc.description.validate202308 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-0594-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS37892703-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jin_Simulating_Retrogressive_Slope.pdfPre-Published version2.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

70
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

82
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.