Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100822
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Nen_US
dc.creatorLu, HJen_US
dc.creatorChang, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T03:14:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-11T03:14:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn2330-2925en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/100822-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.rights©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000220.en_US
dc.subjectBehavioral plasticityen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental conditionsen_US
dc.subjectMoral diversityen_US
dc.subjectMoral psychologyen_US
dc.subjectProsocialityen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the diversity and fluidity of human morality through evolutionary psychologyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage404en_US
dc.identifier.epage409en_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/ebs0000220en_US
dcterms.abstractEvolutionary psychology promotes a functional conceptualization of human morality. A key insight from evolutionary studies on morality is that natural selection should favor both diversity and fluidity in morality. Moral diversity is evidenced by moral psychological research on within- and cross-society variations in the endorsement of moral concerns. Moral fluidity is exhibited in the conditional expression of moral hypocrisy, situational effects on intuitive versus rational moral processing, and environmental effects on the degree of prosociality. From this perspective, empirical methods and evolutionary models can be combined in future research to better explicate how morality develops and manifests in various environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Public Significance Statement—From an evolutionary perspective, we review and explicate evidence of the cross-society diversity, individual differences, and within-person plasticity of moral thinking and behaviors. This view of morality as diversified and fluid potentially serves as a framework for developing interventions to prevent antisocial actions and transgressions, as well as to encourage prosocial actions and altruism.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEvolutionary behavioral sciences, Oct. 2020, v. 14, no. 4, p. 404-409en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEvolutionary behavioral sciencesen_US
dcterms.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85086664594-
dc.identifier.eissn2330-2933en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAPSS-0130-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24989888-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lu_Understanding_Diversity_Fluidity.pdfPre-Published version627.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

46
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.