Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100819
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorLo, CKMen_US
dc.creatorWong, SYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T03:14:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-11T03:14:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn1461-6734en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/100819-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Attachment and human development on 4 Nov 2020 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14616734.2020.1844247.en_US
dc.subjectMentalization-based interventionen_US
dc.subjectMentalizingen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectParenting programsen_US
dc.subjectReflective functioningen_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of parenting programs in regard to improving parental reflective functioning : a meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage76en_US
dc.identifier.epage92en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14616734.2020.1844247en_US
dcterms.abstractAlthough parenting interventions aiming to improve parental RF have been developed, there have been conflicting results in regard to intervention effectiveness. This meta-analytic review seeks to synthesize the available evidence that group-based parenting interventions improve parental RF, in order to provide conclusive evidence regarding their effectiveness. A systematic search was performed to retrieve relevant studies published before November 2019. A total of 15 studies met the selection criteria, of which 3 studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The studies yielded a significant intervention effect with a small pooled effect size (Hedge’s g = 0.279, p = 0.002) on parental RF. However, the pooled effect size of the 3 RCTs was non-significant (pooled effect size: Hedge’s g = 0.189, p = 0.244), indicating that current best evidence is limited. As the heterogeneity test was significant (Q = 32.486, df = 14, p = 0.003), which suggests the presence of heterogeneity among the selected studies, a series of moderator analyses were performed to examine factors that may influence intervention effects. Interventions that involved children in middle childhood had a larger effect size than those involving children in infancy and early childhood.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAttachment and human development, 2022, v. 24, no. 1, p. 76-92en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAttachment and human developmenten_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095736644-
dc.identifier.pmid33143556-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-2988en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAPSS-0118-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS38444169-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lo_Effectiveness_Parenting_Programs.pdfPre-Published version457.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

84
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

193
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

42
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.