Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100793
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorChui, CHKen_US
dc.creatorChan, CHen_US
dc.creatorChandra, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T03:14:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-11T03:14:11Z-
dc.identifier.issn0047-2794en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/100793-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsThis article has been published in a revised form in the Journal of Social Policy, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000490. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Pressen_US
dc.titleThe role of social enterprises in facilitating labour market integration for people with disabilities : a convenient deflection from policy mainstreaming?en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage176en_US
dc.identifier.epage196en_US
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0047279421000490en_US
dcterms.abstractPolicymakers have increasingly embraced social enterprises as a vehicle to create job opportunities for the disadvantaged. However, there is limited research on social enterprises in the context of disability in relation to labour market integration. Drawing on the perspectives of representatives of work integration social enterprises and people with disabilities employed in these enterprises (n=21), this study examines whether and how work integration social enterprises promote inclusion for people with disabilities, and also explores the role of WISEs in enabling people with disabilities to transition into open employment. Thematic analysis revealed three key emergent themes: Cocooned inclusion but not transition; Reinforced normative demarcation; and WISEs as a deflection from institutionalizing proactive disability policy measures. This article argues that, although WISEs were able to provide job opportunities for people with disabilities, their purported function in enabling disabled people to transition into open employment remains constrained by factors beyond their control including prevailing norms and the absence of proactive disability employment measures. This article cautions against the over-romanticisation of WISEs as the primary means to ensure the rights of people with disabilities to participate in the labour market. Implications on disability employment policies in relation to social enterprises are discussed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of social policy, Jan. 2023, v. 52, no. 1, p. 176-196en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of social policyen_US
dcterms.issued2023-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85111613164-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-7823en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAPSS-0024-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54386330-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chandra_Role_Social_Enterprises.pdfPre-Published version382.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

168
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.