Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100682
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Evaluation and comparison of Himawari-8 L2 V1.0, V2.1 and MODIS C6.1 aerosol products over Asia and the Oceania regions
Authors: Yang, X
Zhao, C
Luo, N
Zhao, W
Shi, W 
Yan, X
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2020
Source: Atmospheric environment, 1 Jan. 2020, v. 220, 117068
Abstract: Himawari-8 aerosol products are useful for forecasting weather, environmental monitoring, and climate change research. In 2018, after receiving much attention from researchers, the Himawari-8 Level2 (L2) aerosol retrieval algorithm was updated from Version 1.0 (V1.0) to Version 2.1 (V2.1). Although previous studies have examined the accuracy of Himawari-8 aerosol products, only a few studies have evaluated and compared the V1.0 and V2.1 algorithms or described how the Himawari-8 aerosol products differ from those of MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). In this study, we validated and compared the Himawari-8 L2 V1.0 and V2.1 aerosol products at 500 nm using data from all Asian Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sites for the period from 2016 to 2017. Furthermore, a comprehensive comparison between the Himawari-8 L2 V2.1 and MODIS C6.1 AOD (Terra and Aqua) products was conducted. The V1.0 and V2.1 AOD agreed well with AERONET AOD (R: 0.67–0.72) with 44.65% and 49.38% of retrievals fell within the EE, respectively. Meanwhile, V1.0 and V2.1 AOD bias increased with the AOD magnitude, but V1.0 AOD tended to underestimate the AOD. The underestimation has now improved in the V2.1 AOD products. Both V1.0 and V2.1 AOD performed better over forests and grasslands than croplands, as well as urban and barren lands and had the best performance in summer, while the worst in spring. Overall, the V2.1 AOD outperformed in term of retrievals falling within the EE compared to V1.0 AOD, but it still has large estimation uncertainties in high aerosol loadings areas and sparsely vegetated areas, which indicating the aerosol algorithm needed to improve in the future. Furthermore, the data quality of V2.1 AE/FMF products significantly improved compared to that of V1.0. Compared to the MODIS C6.1 AOD products, Himawari-8 L2 V2.1 AOD accuracy is slightly lower but demonstrates a similar spatial distribution.
Keywords: AERONET
Aerosol
Himawari-8
MODIS
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Journal: Atmospheric environment 
ISSN: 1352-2310
EISSN: 1873-2844
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117068
Rights: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The following publication Yang, X., Zhao, C., Luo, N., Zhao, W., Shi, W., & Yan, X. (2020). Evaluation and Comparison of Himawari-8 L2 V1.0, V2.1 and MODIS C6.1 aerosol products over Asia and the oceania regions. Atmospheric Environment, 220, 117068 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117068.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shi_Evaluation_Comparison_Himawari-8.pdfPre-Published version4.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

73
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

105
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

52
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

48
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.