Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100616
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, Qen_US
dc.creatorNiu, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T03:11:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-11T03:11:06Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5090-1032-5 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5090-1033-2 (Print on Demand(PoD))en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/100616-
dc.description2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC), 13-16 Nov. 2016, Miami, FL, USAen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.rights©2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Q. Wang and S. Niu, "Design optimization and comparative analysis of dual-stator flux-modulated machines," 2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC), 2016, p. 1 is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/CEFC.2016.7816250.en_US
dc.subjectDual-statoren_US
dc.subjectFinite element methoden_US
dc.subjectFlux-modulateden_US
dc.subjectPermanent magneten_US
dc.titleDesign optimization and comparative analysis of dual-stator flux-modulated machinesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/CEFC.2016.7816250en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper quantitatively compares three types of dual-stator flux-modulated (FM) permanent-magnet (PM) machines. Due to the dual-stator topology, these three machines can maximize their use of inner cavity space and achieve higher energy transmission than that of the single-stator one. Also, the flux-modulation feature can be exploited to produce the gear effect, so as to realize high torque at low speed. Depending on their PM locations, the three newly designed flux-modulated machines are referred as (i) stator-rotor PM machine, (ii) rotor PM machine, and (iii) stator PM machine. They run on similar principles, but each of them have their own merits. As different machines have different characteristics, one needs to understand the strength and shortcomings of different machines in order to identify the most suitable machine to better meet the practical industrial requirements. All the machines are optimized designed using GA algorithm. The electromagnetic performances are analyzed and compared using time-stepping finite element method (TS-FEM).en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC), 13-16 Nov. 2016, Miami, FL, USA, 2016, p. 1en_US
dcterms.issued2016-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85011977126-
dc.relation.conferenceIEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation [CEFC]en_US
dc.description.validate202308 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberEE-0587-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS9588239-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Design_Optimization_Comparative.pdfPre-Published version1.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

95
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

51
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.