Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100183
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Biology and Chemical Technologyen_US
dc.creatorLo, Ken_US
dc.creatorLi, Len_US
dc.creatorLeung, Jen_US
dc.creatorTam, WHen_US
dc.creatorChan, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T01:52:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-08T01:52:52Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/100183-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAustin Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsChan et al. © All rights are reserveden_US
dc.rightsAll submissions to Austin Publishing Group is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows anyone to copy, distribute or reuse the articles by properly citing the author and the original source. (publisher site: http://www.austinpublishinggroup.com).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lo, K., Li, L., Leung, J., Tam, W. H., & Chan, R. (2020). Reproducibility and Relative Validity of a Short Food Frequency Questionnaire for Chinese Pregnant Women in Hong Kong. Austin J Nutri Food Sci, 8(3), 1146 is available at https://www.austinpublishinggroup.com/nutrition-food-sciences/v8-i3.php.en_US
dc.subjectFood frequency questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectDietary recallen_US
dc.subjectPregnant womenen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidation studyen_US
dc.subjectAsian dieten_US
dc.titleReproducibility and relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire for Chinese pregnant women in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dcterms.abstractFood Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) should be tailored and shown to be reliable and valid for use in a specific population. Therefore, we developed a short Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for Chinese pregnant women in Hong Kong and evaluated its reproducibility and validity. We recruited 45 pregnant women from a hospital or maternal and child health centers during 29 November 2018 to 14 November 2019, then the short FFQ was administered twice in one month. Three-day Dietary Recalls (DR) were conducted between two FFQ administrations. Relative validity and reproducibility the short FFQ over a period of 1 month. Reliability of dietary intake was evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and the relationship between FFQ- and DR-reported values was examined using Pearson correlation. The reliability of nutrient intake was moderate (0.50 to 0.75) to good (0.75 to 0.90), but only poor (<0.5) to moderate for food group intake. Most nutrients reported by the short FFQ significantly correlated with values reported by dietary recalls. Meanwhile, only several food groups showed significant correlations in the values reported by short FFQ and dietary recalls. When looking across nutrient and food group categories, it is notable that fiber and fruit intake have demonstrated good reliability and validity. To conclude, our short FFQ can serve as a quick assessment tool to identify pregnant women with unhealthy diet in community level and is particularly useful to classify individuals with low fruits or fiber intake.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNutrition journal, 2020, v. 8, no. 3, 1146en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAustin journal of nutrition and food sciencesen_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124591486-
dc.identifier.pmid35164802-
dc.identifier.eissn2381-8980en_US
dc.identifier.artn1146en_US
dc.description.validate202308 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberABCT-0323-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54749747-
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lo_Reproducibility_Relative_Validity.pdf3.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

98
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

40
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of Jun 6, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.